Audio By Carbonatix
Investigative journalist, Manasseh Azure is unimpressed by the nature in which the President’s letter accepting Cecilia Dapaah’s resignation was worded.
According to him, the soft welcoming tone use by President Akufo-Addo suggests that the ongoing investigation may amount to nothing.
The minister resigned from her position on July 22, after reports emerged that she had stashed huge sums of money in her home, part of which had allegedly been stolen by two house helps now facing prosecution alongside other accomplices.

In her letter addressed to the President, Madam Dapaah explained that she decided to step down because she did not want this matter “to become a preoccupation of government and a hindrance to the work of government.”
However, President Akufo-Addo in accepting her resignation praised her for her loyalty and excellent work done during her tenure and also expressed his confidence in the former Minister’s integrity, suggesting also that he was hopeful her integrity would be intact after official investigations.
But speaking on Joy FM, the journalist said "the President trying to vouch for the person's integrity and almost say that I know you come out clean... I think is problematic and can prejudice the trial."

Manasseh says this intonation extends to the Minister's resignation letter which appears to disregard the gravity of the issue at hand by the use of words like 'I thank you my dear, Mr President' among others.
He further believes that the Attorney General's seeming interest in the case will not add any value since he is an appointee of the president.
"And even now that the Attorney General is stepping in, and we know that Attorney General is the President's appointee," he added on the Super Morning Show on Monday, July 31.
He is not the first to raise such an issue.
Asante-Akim North MP Andy Appiah-Kubi also said President Akufo-Addo’s comments extolling and affirming the integrity of the immediate past Sanitation and Water Resources Minister, Cecilia Dapaah, is unnecessary.
“The president’s comments were very unnecessary. If he had any comments, he could have given to another person that he had. But putting those comments out was very unnecessary because if the state institutions finds her culpable, would the president eat back his words? Again, that is his opinion but I wouldn’t do that because it’s unnecessary and kind of prejudicial,” he said on Accra-based TV3.
Latest Stories
-
Ghana housing finance conference adopts communiqué to improve affordable housing access
3 hours -
Special Initiatives Minister urges Wa Technical Institute to enrol more girls as EU-backed solar training lab opens
4 hours -
In the matter of my first year at the Bar
4 hours -
ActionAid Ghana calls for an end to child marriage, greater investment in girls’ rights
4 hours -
Newsfile to tackle World Cup visa scandal, beach demolitions, education strikes, BRICS bid
4 hours -
UK-Ghana Trade & Investment Summit: Trade Resource Centre to help businesses maximise UK-Ghana trade opportunities
5 hours -
Embassy of Denmark celebrates World Maritime Day
5 hours -
Linking LEAP to productive inclusion could cut extreme poverty by 2030 – UNICEF
6 hours -
Trade Ministry backs use of creative arts to rehabilitate prison inmates
6 hours -
Negotiations with government to continue despite strike suspension – GNAT
6 hours -
‘Ghana cannot afford to waste public resources; every cedi has a job’ – Ato Forson
6 hours -
Ghana expects economic boost as World Assemblies of God Congress brings 10,000 delegates to Accra
6 hours -
Joy in Nayilifong as Farouk Aliu Mahama donates 100kVA transformer to improve power supply
7 hours -
Chief Justice urges employers to tackle mental health stigma in workplaces
7 hours -
Analysis: Ghana’s yellow fever numbers reveal a gap between vaccination and protection
8 hours