Women invited for breast cancer screening in the UK are to be given more information about the potential harm of being tested.
An independent review was set up to settle a fierce debate about whether the measure did more harm than good.
It showed that for every life saved, three women had treatment for a cancer which would never have been fatal.
The information will be included on leaflets to give women an “informed choice”, the government said.
Cancer charities said women should still take up the offer of screening.
Screening has been a fixture in diagnosing breast cancer for more than two decades. Women aged between 50 and 70 are invited to have a mammogram every three years. It helps doctors catch cancer early so treatment can be given when it is more likely to save lives.
However, the national cancer director Prof Sir Mike Richards said it had become “an area of high controversy”.
The debate centres around the concept of “overdiagnosis”, that is screening which correctly identifies a tumour, but one which would never have caused harm. It leads to women who would have lived full and healthy lives having treatments – such as surgery, hormone therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy – which have considerable side-effects.
There is no way of knowing which tumours will be deadly and which could have been left alone.
The review, published in the Lancet medical journal, showed that screening saved 1,307 lives every year in the UK, but led to 3,971 women having unnecessary treatment. From the point of view of a single patient they have a 1% chance of being overdiagnosed if they go for screening.
The independent review panel was led by Prof Michael Marmot, from University College London. He said screening had “contributed to reducing deaths” but also “resulted in some overdiagnosis”.
He said it was “vital” women were told about the potential harms and benefits before going for a mammogram.
Prof Richards said: “My view is that the screening programme should happen, we should invite women to be screened and give women the information to make their own choice.”
He said the leaflets on breast cancer screening sent to women would be updated in the “next few months” to “give the facts in a clear, unbiased way”.
Current advice does not highlight the scale of the risk.
Cancer charities have unanimously argued that women should still choose to be screened.
A joint statement by Breakthrough Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Campaign and Breast Cancer Care said: “We encourage all women to attend their screening appointments.”
It said the review provided “much-needed clarity” that screening saves lives, but women must be given “clear and balanced information” to highlight the harms.
Cancer Research UK, which commissioned the review alongside the Department of Health, said that “on balance” it thought that women should go ahead with screening.
Its chief executive Dr Harpal Kumar said: “Because we can’t yet tell which cancers are harmful and which are not, we cannot predict what will happen in an individual woman’s case.
“Research is advancing at pace and we hope that in the future there will be a number of new techniques that we can use alongside the screening programme to make it more sophisticated and reduce the numbers of women having unnecessary treatment.”
Richard Winder, the deputy director of the NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, said: “This was a robust review and we appreciate the rigour and efforts of the panel in conducting it.
“We are pleased that the panel concluded the NHS Breast Cancer Screening Programme confers significant benefit and should continue.
“Where they have made recommendations, we will work with all partners to take these forward.”
- ‘Supreme Court was afraid, didn’t do justice to election petition hearing’ – Kpessa-Whyte
- ‘God is alive’ – Shatta Wale speaks after being granted bail
- I was sued for instituting reforms at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital – Okoe Boye reveals
- Chinese students sue Apple for not including a charger with the iPhone 12
- Akufo-Addo presents 50 vehicles to army; cuts sod for $24.8m housing project
- ‘The power of the people is stronger than the people in power’ – Alban Bagbin
- Police secures order to refer husband of missing woman, Rhodaline Amoah for psychiatric exams
- 29 in court for assaulting Police officers in Ada
- A woman pope? Meet the feminists trying to save the Catholic Church
- I carried the cross for my family, it must end with me – Breast cancer survivor
GFA announces a ‘No Vaccination, No Entry’ policy for its events
Covid-19: Ghana’s active cases now 1,817
Sudan army sacks six envoys as coup condemnation grows
Sudan coup: World Bank suspends aid after military takeover
Education Ministry terminates 27 of Mahama’s E-block contracts
Defaulters of ‘Operation Clean Your Frontage’ will get 1-year imprisonment – Henry Quartey
Benin bronze: ‘Looted’ Nigerian sculpture being returned by university
Extensively read contracts before signing a deal – Becca to colleague singers
Pope Francis to visit Canada for indigenous reconciliation
Useless column with Mawuli Zogbenu: ‘I dodged the left breast’
Kenya nurses fail English test for UK jobs
Liverpool plan to make Salah highest earner revealed, as contract claims rubbished
Twitter announces total revenue of $1.28bn, 13% year-over-year growth in Monetizable Daily Active Usage
Man waits till wedding day to confess to bride that he has no legs
Cristiano Ronaldo holding Man United dressing room together