Lawyers of the Judicial Service of Ghana have cautioned all media houses in the country to desist from publishing hateful, indecent and offensive statements against judges.
Their concern, they say "arises from the publication and/or permitting the publication of a series of incendiary, hateful and offensive statements, and speeches on their various platforms against the Justices.
"This concern has been heightened by the flurry of statements and speeches directed at our client's Justices, especially after the commencement of hearing of the election petition in the suit intituled John Dramani Mahama v Electoral Commission & Nana Addo," the statement read.
In the letter addressed to all media houses in the country, the legal counsel noted that publishing hateful and offensive stories against adjudicators threaten the democracy and peaceful nature of the country.
It further stated that some of these "publications directly insinuate that the decisions of the Justices presiding over the matter are motivated by factors outside legal principles and proper judicial consideration".
Of further concern to the justices is the fact that "The focus of the statements and speeches therefore patently insinuate that... the decisions are motivated by corrupt factors and devoid of any legal justification and/or reasoning."
It has, therefore, cautioned media houses that these "statements and speeches interfere with the due administration of justice as Justices of our client are threatened with ominous consequences following their decisions which do not meet the expectations of some members of the society.
“The statements and speeches bring the administration of justice into disrepute as unsuspecting Ghanaians are being deliberately misinformed and manipulated to believe that the justice system is perverted and lacking in credibility,” the letter read.
In conclusion, it drew the attention of the media to the Ghanaian population which "consists largely of uneducated or not very well-informed people", as such "it is necessary to take a stricter view of what criticism may be allowed of the justice system", because "although the administration of justice must suffer the respectful though outspoken [not inciteful, hateful or spiteful] comments of ordinary men, it must not be adversely interfered with and/or brought into dispute".
Latest Stories
-
I’ve really worked well as Veep; vote for me as President – Bawumia to traders
3 mins -
There’s something mysteriously amiss somewhere about ongoing ‘dumsor’ – Gabby Otchere-Darko
16 mins -
South Africa: Team Western Cape wins National Primary School Track and Field Championships
31 mins -
Chale Wote Street Art Festival: A call for artists ahead of 2024 edition
2 hours -
Floods: We’re exposed but my team and I are ‘running’ to catch up – Oppong Nkrumah
2 hours -
5 traits of sweet, committed men that may seem like red flags at first
4 hours -
We met on Twitter and our first date was a week-long road trip
4 hours -
The biggest mistake people make when meeting someone in person after talking online
4 hours -
I traveled 500 miles for a first date
4 hours -
My cousin saved my life and she never knew
4 hours -
Top UN court orders Israel to allow food and medical aid into Gaza
4 hours -
Fallen ‘Crypto King’ Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years for fraud
5 hours -
The architecture we have used to tackle housing deficit has not been robust enough – Oppong Nkrumah
5 hours -
Government suspends implementation of price Stabilisation and Recovery levy on petroleum products
6 hours -
Takoradi traders lament over low sales ahead of Easter
7 hours