
Audio By Carbonatix
Director of Advocacy and Policy Engagement at CDD-Ghana, Dr. Kojo Pumpuni Asante has expressed his disapproval for the LGBTQ+ bill currently before Parliament.
According to him, the bill is not only problematic, but has a lot of inconsistencies, and rides on a lot of emotions.
“For me, this whole bill is a non-starter. It has been a non-starter for some of us right from the beginning because even the way the problem, the public policy challenge is presented in the memoranda is inconsistent, it is confusing, it rides on emotions,” he stressed on The Probe on Sunday, June 9.
He further added that “for a bill that basically seeks to imprison people for their sexual preferences and so on, for us not being able to be discipline in addressing or even framing what the problem is, is a big issue.
“And right from that start, it then accelerated into all manner of violations of the constitution because the proponents of the bill are so committed to it in a way."
Dr Asante further pointed out that since the content of the bill is such that anyone who speaks about LGBT or advocates for it must be imprisoned, it could lay up trouble for Parliament.
He explained that parliament might not be able to suggest making amends once it becomes a law because the bill has injuncted parliament from trying to change it later in the future.
Additionally, he contended that LGBT is not a novelty in Ghana, therefore if it is now considered an issue, then parliament is addressing it in the wrong way
According to him, the eagerness of Parliament to pass the bill into law is based on fear-mongering that if a stop is not put to it, all Ghanaians and the future generation to come will become queer.
This, he stressed, will not resolve the issue.
Again, he expressed his disappointment with the proceedings of the second reading of the LGBTQ+ bill in parliament on Wednesday, July 5.
Dr. Asante stated that the way that parliament went about the second proceeding of the bill was as though if any legislator dared to say he or she was not in favour of the bill, then they were going to have the public against them.
Latest Stories
-
US Army veteran charged with leaking classified information to journalist
43 minutes -
Dr. Dre joins Forbes billionaires list as second-richest hip-hop artist with $1 billion fortune
44 minutes -
Trump administration cannot nix legal status of 5,000 Ethiopians, US judge rules
54 minutes -
Libya announces new oil and gas discoveries with three major energy companies
1 hour -
Oil rises as investors remain wary US-Iran ceasefire will open supply flow
1 hour -
Police arrest suspect over church threat video
3 hours -
Eight appear in court as police intensify crackdown on illicit drugs in Tamale
3 hours -
Motorist remanded in custody for hitting four-year-old girl
4 hours -
Mobile money vendor robbed at Ziope
4 hours -
Benin’s Finance Minister Wadagni seeks his own mandate in election
4 hours -
GNFS retrieves body of unidentified man from Asylum Down drain
4 hours -
CAF’s Motsepe to visit both Senegal and Morocco amid AFCON fallout
4 hours -
Edmond Boateng takes up secretary role at Honorary Consular Corps of Ghana
4 hours -
Armed men kill 20 and abduct others in northwestern Nigeria villages
5 hours -
Gambia appoints British barrister to prosecute gruesome Jammeh-era crimes
5 hours