Audio By Carbonatix
A US judge has once again blocked President Donald Trump from implementing an executive order ending birthright citizenship for some US residents as a legal challenge moves forward.
A New Hampshire judge approved a class action lawsuit against Trump's executive order and temporarily stopped the president's order from taking effect.
The class action lawsuit was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of immigrant parents and their infants.
The decision comes weeks after the Supreme Court introduced limits on how and when universal injunctions are issued by federal courts. However, the decision still allows them through certain legal avenues.
The class action suit was introduced after the Supreme Court decision, in keeping with the new standards set by the court.
Still, the White House challenged the validity of the judge's ruling.
"Today's decision is an obvious and unlawful attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court's clear order against universal relief. This judge's decision disregards the rule of law by abusing class action certification procedures," spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement Thursday. "The Trump Administration will be fighting vigorously against the attempts of these rogue district court judges to impede the policies President Trump was elected to implement."
The US Constitution guarantees citizenship to all born on US soil, but Trump has sought to revoke that right for babies born to undocumented immigrants and foreign visitors, as part of his crackdown on immigration.
The class-action lawsuit seeks to challenge the order as harmful and unconstitutional, and the judge ruled that it can proceed on behalf of the babies who would be affected by the restrictions.
The ruling also once again pauses an order that was a priority for Trump. The judge has given the government seven days to appeal.
Restricting birthright citizenship was one of his first actions in office.
Multiple courts across the US issued nationwide injunctions as they considered legal challenges to the order.
The Trump administration appealed those temporary holds to the highest US court, arguing judges did not have the authority to block a presidential order nationally while the courts considered the cases.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority sided with Trump in a 6-3 ruling that broadly curtailed judicial power, though the justices did not address the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order.
Following the Supreme Court's decision, Trump's order had been set to take effect on 27 July.
Latest Stories
-
Agricultural Economist proposes blended financing model to support cocoa sector
27 seconds -
NPP MP warns against reducing producer price as government rolls out cocoa reforms
31 minutes -
Tano North MP urges halt to grain exports over food glut
32 minutes -
Farmers hopeful as government moves to expedite cocoa payments
1 hour -
Tensions at Agbogbloshie market women oppose AMA drain cleaning exercise, items confiscated
1 hour -
Lyse Doucet: In Tehran, rallies for Iran’s revolution overshadowed by discontent and defiance
1 hour -
Education Minister orders full audit of free sanitary pads in schools over quality concerns
1 hour -
IGP promotes 12,000 police officers, clears all backlog
2 hours -
Buduburam firefighters prevent gas explosion at Big Apple
2 hours -
Emigoh marks 20 years with launch of two new Yomi Yoghurt flavours
2 hours -
National Vaccine Institute takes step forward with audit committee launch
2 hours -
SOSA ’99 launches Year of Return 2027, donates towards SUSEC Clinic
2 hours -
Berima Sydney pays tribute to Ebony at Naughty Saturday in Sunyani
2 hours -
Adolescents from 6 countries lead urban dialogue in Accra
2 hours -
Republic Bank reveals benefits of joining the “Republic Verse” – A bold banking universe
2 hours
