Audio By Carbonatix
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that President Trump cannot block people from his Twitter account in response to their political views because it violates their right to free speech.
U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald reasoned in her opinion that Twitter is a designated public forum, so blocking users based on their political speech "constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment." She rejected the president's defense that the First Amendment didn't apply, and "the President's personal First Amendment interests supersede those of the plaintiffs," the Knight First Amendment Institute and others.
Buchwald also disagreed with the contention of the defense that injunctive relief can never be awarded against the president, but she decided that she didn't need to "enter that legal thicket at this time." She instead settled on a declaratory judgment that "no government official -- including the President -- is above the law."
She said that "the individual plaintiffs were indisputably blocked" by Mr. Trump "as a result of viewpoint discrimination."
In the original suit, the group of blocked users describe Mr. Trump's frequent use of Twitter as "a kind of digital town hall in which the president and his aides use the tweet function to communicate news and information to the public."
"Because of the way the President and his aides use the @realDonaldTrump Twitter account, the account is a public forum under the First Amendment," the lawsuit states. "Defendants have made the account accessible to all, taking advantage of Twitter's interactive platform to directly engage the President's 33 million followers."
Buchwald applied the Supreme Court's three-part standard for determining whether the communication constitutes private speech or government speech:
- If the speech has been used historically to convey state messages
- If it is "often closely identified in the public mind" with the government
- How much "direct control over the messages conveyed" stems from the government
The defendants disputed this definition, arguing that the @realDonaldTrump account is technically the president's personal page, while @POTUS is designated as his official presidential Twitter account. With this distinction, Mr. Trump's account would qualify as private speech.
However, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York found that this was not the case.
"In so holding, we reject the defendants' contentions that the First Amendment does not apply in this case and that the President's personal First Amendment interests supersede those of plaintiffs," the memorandum reads.
Latest Stories
-
Dr Kwabena Donkor links falling fuel prices to cedi strength, global oil rates
53 seconds -
‘Essien has been a big part of my development’ – Nordsjaelland’s Prince Amoako Junior
12 minutes -
Selective fuel discounts breach uniform pricing law – Dr Kwabena Donkor
14 minutes -
Dr. Dramani Bukari’s call for the establishment of a public transport economic regulatory authority
24 minutes -
Women’s Premier League referee allegedly assaulted during Ampem Darkoa vs Savanna match
48 minutes -
Ghana’s Daniel Laryea was the best referee at 2025 AFCON – Former Sports Minister
49 minutes -
Playing for Chelsea would be a dream – Prince Amoako Junior
55 minutes -
High sales demands force short trips, leaving commuters stranded in Accra – Drivers lament
1 hour -
Dr Kwabena Donkor opposes fuel floor price at selected locations, calls for nationwide compliance
1 hour -
Fella Makafui pursues legal action over ‘disturbing comment’ about daughter
1 hour -
Leadership is not about how long you have been around
1 hour -
Arise Ghana pickets US embassy, demands Ofori-Atta’s return
1 hour -
Not a replacement, not a fluke: Wendy Shay’s relentless climb to stardom
1 hour -
IFC urges Ghana to sustain economic gains to boost investor confidence
1 hour -
Today’s Front pages: Tuesday, January 20, 2026
1 hour
