
Audio By Carbonatix
A senior law lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Law says Justice Jones Dotse was wrong in commenting on the Supreme Court (SC) judgement on the voters' register.
Dr Raymond Atuguba said judges are "allowed to make public statements in specified circumstances and not comments about cases to journalists".
After several weeks of different interpretations of a Supreme Court judgement on the voters' register, Justice Dotse told journalists the court ordered the Electoral Commission (EC) to delete names of voters who registered with the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) cards from the electoral roll.
Some people considered Justice Dotse's remarks as settling the long-standing debate about the judgement by the apex court.
Speaking on Joy FM and MultiTV's analysis programme, Newsfile on Saturday, Dr Atuguba said rule 3 (9) of the code of conduct of judges and magistrates does not allow the judge to make those comments.
"It states clearly that don't make public comments...it says speaking to a journalist is a public comment so there is no way you can say that you can speak to a journalist and still be within the rule," he argued.
Dr Atuguba continued that "...the rule says don't make public comments and if you speak to a journalist off the record that is a public comment so you can't make a public comment but you can make a public statement. What Justice Dotse did was a public comment and he shouldn't have."
The law lecturer added that journalists misinterpreted what Justice Atuguba said.

"The man says I am not interpreting the judgement and then the next day all the newspapers say Justice Dotse has interpreted the judgement, how did we arrive at that in this country," Dr Atuguba quizzed.
On the contrary, the editor-in-chief of the New Crusading Guide newspaper spoke against the assertion that Justice Dotse violated a code of conduct of judges.
Abdul Malik Kweku Baako on the same platform indicated that Justice Dotse settled the issue relative to "those who used the NHIS cards to register."

He said, "Justice Dotse only explained and clarified the bare facts of the judgement that has already been made public."
After quoting the sub rule 9 of rule 3, Mr Baako said, "comments and statement are used interchangeable that is clearly what it is...it is as simple as that."
Meanwhile, the Deputy Minister for Power, John Jinapor believes that the status of Justice Dotse makes his comments on the SC judgement create anxiety.

John Jinapor and the Communications Director of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Nana Akomea urged the plaintiff in the case to go for clarification of the judgement.

Latest Stories
-
Photos: Mahama receives full state welcome in Paris ahead of talks with French President Macron
58 seconds -
Deputy Health Minister endorses Women in Medicine Fellowship
2 minutes -
Duncan Amoah pushes for Consumer Protection Bill amid VIP fare hike
14 minutes -
LMWG backs Damang lease award to E&P, demands transparency and results
19 minutes -
Volta Chiefs condemns EOCO over alleged disregard for court ruling in Council of State member case
19 minutes -
Matthew Perry’s stepmother says ‘Ketamine Queen’ should get maximum sentence
20 minutes -
Northern Regional Police Command intensifies anti-drug operations, arrests 217 suspects
21 minutes -
The architect of a healthier Ghana: Mahama’s vision and legacy in primary healthcare
23 minutes -
Israel carries out large wave of air strikes across Lebanon
28 minutes -
BBC upholds complaints over racial slur in Baftas broadcast
29 minutes -
Kukurantumi set to host 2025/26 Women’s FA Cup Final as Hasaacas Ladies face Army Ladies
29 minutes -
Where the law stops: Torture, power, and the failure of prevention in Ghana
30 minutes -
Only 6% of imports insured locally despite mandatory policy – GSA raises concern
35 minutes -
IndomieFest Accra 2026 delivers Ghana’s premier family festival at Easter
41 minutes -
GIP Secures $20m boost from Norfund, Axis Pensions to deepen SME financing in Ghana
48 minutes