According to Section 25 of Act 651:
(1) Every worker is entitled to enjoy an unbroken period of leave but an employer, in cases of urgent necessity, may in accordance with this section, require a worker to interrupt his or her leave and return to work.
(2) Where a worker is required by the employer to interrupt his or her leave in the circumstances specified in subsection (1) the worker shall not forfeit the right to the remainder of the leave but shall take the leave anytime thereafter.
(3) Where a worker takes his or her annual leave at the end of a calendar year, the leave may continue except as provided in subsection (1) without interruption, into the following year.
Based on Section 25(1), an employer may require a worker to interrupt (and thus defer) their leave and return to work. Practically, it also means an employer may require a worker, for the same urgent necessity reason, to continue working even though the worker is due to start their leave.
So, Section 25 provisions are effectively at the instance of the employer, designed to take care of emergency situations. But if the worker took the initiative and the employer did not stop him, then I guess the principle of estoppel sets in. One can imply an agreement between the worker and the employer so long as the employer was aware the worker did not proceed on leave and rather continued working, and the employer did not take any steps to request the worker to proceed on leave on the due date. That is to say, the leave of the worker is deemed as deferred (accumulated) in accordance with Section 25 if, out of urgent necessity of their work, they do not take their annual leave as scheduled.
However, the worker is required by Subsection 2 to “take the leave anytime thereafter.”
Section 31 says the worker can’t relinquish or forgo their leave. Accumulating or Deferring your leave is to delay it, while to forgo it means to forfeit it. So, Section 25 and 31 are well in sync.
In conclusion, there is indeed such a thing as Accumulated Leave under the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651). An employee “shall not forfeit the right to the remainder of the leave but shall take the leave anytime thereafter”. Anytime thereafter…
Kwaku Antwi-Boasiako, Accra
July 1, 2020
Disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer or a law student.
Latest Stories
-
Herman Suede is set to release ‘How Dare You’ on April 24
3 hours -
Heal KATH: Kuapa Kokoo, Association of Garages donate 120k to support project
3 hours -
KNUST signs MOU with Valco Trust Fund, Bekwai Municipal Hospital to build student hostel
3 hours -
The influence Ronaldo has on people, Cadman Yamoah will have same on the next generation – Coach Goodwin
4 hours -
Gender Advocate Emelia Naa Ayeley Aryee Wins prestigious Merck Foundation Awards
5 hours -
South Africa bursary scandal suspects granted bail
5 hours -
Ecobank successfully repays $500m Eurobond due April 18
5 hours -
Re: Doe Adjaho, Torgbui Samlafo IV, call for Unity among Paramountcies in Anlo
5 hours -
Extortion and kidnap – a deadly journey across Mexico into the US
5 hours -
Rihanna says fashion has helped her personal ‘rediscovery’ after having children
6 hours -
Development Bank Ghana targets GH¢1bn funding for commercial banks in 2024
6 hours -
Shatta Movement apologises to Ghana Society of the Physically Disabled after backlash
7 hours -
Sammy Gyamfi writes: Tema-Mpakadan Railway Project; A railway line to nowhere
7 hours -
Bright Simons: Is the World Bank saving or harming Ghana?
7 hours -
CAF Cup: RS Berkane banned from entering Algeria because of a map of Morocco with its Sahara
8 hours