The Supreme Court has, in a unanimous decision, dismissed a case filed against the regulation of plant breeders.
Parliament in 2020 passed the Plant Variety Protection Act, 2020 (ACT 1050) to regulate breeders.
A breeder under this law is a person who bred or discovered and developed a variety, the employer of the person or the successor in title of the person.
The law makes a breeder bound to any measure taken by Ghana to regulate the “production, certification and marketing of material of a variety of the importation or exportation of the material.
The law requires breeders to apply for a plant breeder right in order to undertake the activity. Food advocacy group, Food Sovereignty Ghana dragged the Attorney General to the Supreme Court contending that these portions of the law are unconstitutional.
The group through its lawyers argued that these portions of the law constitute “an unnecessary infringement on the farmers’ rights to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seeds and other propagating material.
They also pointed out that it hinders “farmers’ right to propagate material as same is hindered by authorisation”.
They pointed out that this law was passed to enforce an international convention which has not been ratified by Ghana.
The group wanted the Supreme Court to declare these portions of the law as unconstitutional. A seven-member Supreme Court panel presided over by Justice Paul Baffoe Bonnie on May 31 unanimously dismissed the case. Justice Bonnie pointed out that “the case fails in its entirety as the jurisdiction of the court has not been properly invoked”.
He said the Court's full reasons will be available on October 2, 2023. Other panel members were Justices Gabriel Pwamang, Professor Henrietta Mensah Bonsu, Lovelace Johnson, Emmanuel Y. Kulendi and Barba Ackah-Yensu. Lead counsel for the group Wayoe Ghanamannti told JoyNews he disagrees with the decisions.
“They said their jurisdiction have not been invoked. We are yet to see the reasons but we will wait and advise our clients and seek a review. It is trite law that domestic law and international law are different and must be ratified before they are used,” he stated.
Latest Stories
-
Saminu Abdul Rasheed smashes national record again with 9.84s sprint in Georgia
35 minutes -
Blekusu Coastal project: We’re reclaiming our coastlines – Housing Minister
3 hours -
Pricey plantains push Ghana’s market sellers to diversify
3 hours -
Full list: NPP delegates approve 54 reform motions, reject proposals on youth age, election supervision
4 hours -
WAFCON 2024: Cynthia made it easy – Chantelle hails goalkeeper after penalty saves
4 hours -
Cyber Security Authority boss suspended over use of military bodyguard
4 hours -
WAFCON 2024: I want to make history – Grace Asantewaa dreams of lifting the trophy
4 hours -
Afenyo-Markin accuses NDC of rebranding and claiming credit for NPP projects
4 hours -
2024 WAFCON: Grace Asantewa shines as Black Queens reach semis
4 hours -
WAFCON 2024: Ghana beat Algeria 4-2 on penalties to book semi-final spot for the first time since 2016
4 hours -
NPP Delegates reject motion to shift polling station selection oversight to regional committees
4 hours -
2024 WAFCON: Black Queens set up semifinal clash with hosts Morocco
4 hours -
Dr. Amuasi champions healthy sustainable socio-ecological systems thinking in Lancet One Health Commission Report
5 hours -
Without unity, we’re just individuals with ambition – Afenyo-Markin
5 hours -
Rebecca Tweneboah Darko: Scattered thoughts; Scary times
5 hours