Law professor and legal expert, Prof Kwame Gyan, has criticised Ghana’s current system of vetting ministerial nominees, describing it as inadequate and ineffective in assessing the competence and suitability of nominees.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, January 18, with Samson Lardy Anyenini, Prof Gyan called for reforms to ensure a more rigorous and transparent process.
“We are looking at the technical competence, integrity, and overall suitability of nominees for the roles they’ve been chosen to perform. Yet, the current vetting process does not sufficiently address these criteria,” he remarked.
He emphasised the significance of the process, noting that the collective competence of the 60 ministers to be appointed will shape the destiny of Ghana’s 35 million citizens.
“These 60 people will determine the future of our country and that of unborn generations. If their collective competencies are inadequate, then we are doomed,” he warned.
Prof Gyan highlighted the critical role vetting plays in reassuring the public and international markets. “When nominees like a finance minister are vetted, their responses should demonstrate competence and inspire confidence in their ability to manage key areas like the economy and the cedi. If this doesn’t happen, the markets and speculators will question their capability,” he said.
However, he criticised the current system, which he described as a mere formality. “In Ghana, once the president nominates you, you are essentially a minister. We do not have a history of rejecting vetted nominees. This defeats the purpose of vetting as a rigorous process to assess competency, integrity, and suitability,” he noted.
He also expressed concerns about the omnibus appointments committee, calling it outdated and ineffective. “The omnibus approach is not the way to go. Even with the new standing orders, the process remains flawed. We need to adopt a system that brings out not just integrity but also competency, as seen in the American system,” he suggested.
Prof Gyan advocated for a complete modernisation of the vetting process, proposing that it be treated as a serious job interview.
“These are top-level jobs, and we must ensure the nominees are capable. The rule that allows only two members to ask one question each is insufficient. This process needs to be revised to reflect the seriousness of the positions being filled,” he concluded.
Latest Stories
-
NPA Scandal: Four suspects remain in custody after failing to meet bail conditions
59 minutes -
NPP to open 2028 flagbearer nominations on July 29
1 hour -
NDC opens nominations for Akwatia parliamentary primaries on July 28
3 hours -
Guinness Ghana DJ Awards opened new doors for my career – DJ Pho
3 hours -
Mohammed Sukparu commits to advancing Ghana’s Artificial Intelligence agenda
3 hours -
‘What is coding?’ – Question raises eyebrows during Deputy Communication Minister-nominee’s hearing
3 hours -
WAFCON 2024: Ghana’s Black Queens claim third-place after penalty win over South Africa
4 hours -
Ghana celebrates 100-year-old WWII veteran Joseph Ashitey Hammond
4 hours -
Measures announced in Mid-Year Budget Review fully in line with programme objectives – IMF
4 hours -
This Saturday on Newsfile: AG drops charges in uniBank trial, Aud-General’s report, and Mid-Year Budget Review
5 hours -
Parliament passes Road Maintenance Trust Fund Bill
5 hours -
Heavy security deployed at Manhyia Palace following Asawase shootings
5 hours -
Kumawu MP Ernest Anim urges Parliament to act on crisis in Ghana’s prisons
6 hours -
Kumawu MP decries ‘Inhumane’ feeding rate in Ghana’s prisons
6 hours -
Mahama appeals for calm in Nkwanta, condemns recent killings
7 hours