Audio By Carbonatix
US President Donald Trump has faced growing criticism over his threats to attack Iran's cultural sites.
Mr Trump made the threats amid fallout from the US assassination of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani.
The president said cultural sites were among 52 identified Iranian targets that could be attacked if Iranians "torture, maim and blow up our people".
But the UN's cultural organisation and UK foreign secretary were among those to note that such sites were protected.
The US and Iran have signed conventions to protect cultural heritage, including during conflict. Military attacks targeting cultural sites are considered war crimes under international law.
Qasem Soleimani was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad on Friday on the orders of Mr Trump. The killing has sharply increased regional tensions, with Iran threatening "severe revenge".
What were the president's threats?
The first came in a series of tweets on Saturday.
Mr Trump said the US had identified 52 Iranian sites, some "at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture", and warned they would be "hit very fast and hard" if Tehran carried out revenge attacks on US interests or personnel.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo appeared to try to soften the threat by saying the US would act within international law.
But the president later repeated his threat, saying: "They're allowed to kill our people, they're allowed to torture and maim our people, they're allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people - and we're not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn't work that way."
On Monday, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway defended the president, saying he had not said he was targeting cultural sites, only "asking the question".
She also said: "Iran has many strategic military sites that you may cite are also cultural sites", before later clarifying her remark to say she was not suggesting Iran had camouflaged military targets as cultural sites.
Defence Secretary Mark Esper was later asked if the US would target cultural sites, and said: "We will follow the laws of armed conflict."
When asked if that meant no, "because targeting a cultural site is a war crime?", he responded: "That's the laws of armed conflict."
What criticism did his comments draw?
The director-general of the UN's cultural organisation, Unesco, Audrey Azoulay, said both Iran and the US had signed a 1972 convention to protect the world's natural and cultural heritage.
They have also both signed a 1954 convention protecting cultural property in the event of armed conflict. Mr Trump withdrew the US from Unesco in 2018, citing alleged anti-Israeli bias.
US Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Chris Murphy said Mr Trump was "threatening to commit war crimes", echoing similar statements by Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif.
On Monday, UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said cultural sites were protected by international law, and Britain expected that to be respected.
The wider region has suffered many cultural attacks carried out by the Islamic State group, which targeted mosques, shrines, churches and famous sites such as Palmyra in Syria. The Taliban in Afghanistan destroyed the world's tallest Buddha statues, in Bamiyan province.
There are also a number of sites which - while not listed by Unesco - still retain huge cultural importance.
Iran's top cultural sites
Iran is home to two dozen Unesco World Heritage sites. These are landmarks the UN body believes need preserving for their cultural, historic or scientific significance. They include:- Persepolis, the capital of the ancient Persian Achaemenid Empire, whose earliest remains date back to the 6th Century BC
- Naqsh-e Jahan Square in the city of Isfahan, which was built in the early 17th Century and is one of the largest city squares in the world
- Golestan Palace in Tehran, the residence and seat of power for the Qajar dynasty which ruled Iran from 1785 to 1925
There are also a number of sites which - while not listed by Unesco - still retain huge cultural importance.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Accra turns white as Dîner en Blanc delivers night of elegance and culture
33 minutes -
War-torn Myanmar voting in widely criticised ‘sham’ election
2 hours -
Justice by guesswork is dangerous – Constitution Review Chair calls for data-driven court reforms
2 hours -
Justice delayed is justice denied, the system is failing litigants – Constitution Review Chair
3 hours -
Reform without data is a gamble – Constitution Review Chair warns against rushing Supreme Court changes
3 hours -
Rich and voiceless: How Putin has kept Russia’s billionaires on side in the war against Ukraine
4 hours -
Cruise ship hits reef on first trip since leaving passenger on island
4 hours -
UK restricts DR Congo visas over migrant return policy
4 hours -
Attack on Kyiv shows ‘Russia doesn’t want peace’, Zelensky says
4 hours -
Two dead in 50-vehicle pile up on Japan highway
4 hours -
Fearing deportation, Hondurans in the US send more cash home than ever before
5 hours -
New York blanketed in snow, sparking travel chaos
5 hours -
Creative Canvas 2025: Documenting Ghana’s creative year beyond the noise
8 hours -
We would have lost that game last season – Guardiola
8 hours -
Nigeria reach AFCON last 16 despite Tunisia fightback
9 hours
