Audio By Carbonatix
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has strongly criticised the establishment of the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) team by President John Mahama, describing it as illegal and unconstitutional.
According to him, President Mahama lacked the legal authority to form the committee at the time, as he was merely the president-elect and not yet in office.
Speaking on JoyFM Top Story on Wednesday, January 15, Mr Darko argued that Section 3 of the Whistleblowers Act lists specific individuals and entities to whom whistleblowers can report, such as Police Officers, the Attorney General, the Auditor General, Staff of Intelligence Agencies, and Members of Parliament.
He stated that while his colleague in Parliament, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, who is the MP for North Tongu qualifies to be on the committee, he questioned the qualifications of other members of the ORAL team under the provisions of the Act.
“If we take Hon Okudzeto Ablakwa who is a Member of Parliament and so if anybody feels that some crime has been committed, it can go to him.
"But does Martin Kpebu fall into any of these categories? Is he a member of the National Media Commission? Is Kofi Boakye, the former Police officer, a member of the Narcotics Control Board? Is Mr. Domelevo part of a district assembly or head of a recognized institution or religious body," he asked.
Mr Darko insisted that the formation of the ORAL team contravened the provisions of the Whistleblowers Act.
He further noted that as president-elect, Mr Mahama did not have executive authority at the time to create such a committee.
“The Whistleblowers Act he's talking about has the people you can disclose information to not a group of people set up by a President.
“In any case, when His Excellency the President John Dramani Mahama set up the ORAL Committee, he was the president-elect, he did not hold any executive authority. What legal authority did he have to set up the ORAL in the first place," the Suame MP questioned.
He asserted that the ORAL Committee, from its inception, lacked a constitutional foundation, stating that the committee is "unconstitutional and illegal."
Latest Stories
-
Fifa scraps controversial World Cup investment plan
2 hours -
WAFCON 2026: South Africa fight back to earn dramatic draw against Côte d’Ivoire
2 hours -
We should not over-commercialise football – Eric Alagidede
2 hours -
GFA should reject FIFA’s World Cup sale proposal – Eric Alagidede
2 hours -
Ghanaian woman jailed 5 years in US for $1.6million romance scam
2 hours -
Parliament passes Energy Sector Levies Amendment Bill to tighten fuel subsidy regime
3 hours -
Unique by Design project launched to promote disability inclusion in Ghana’s fashion industry
5 hours -
Joseph Paul Amoah finishes seventh in Commonwealth Games 200m final
5 hours -
Mahama urges Dagbon Regent to preserve peace and continue late Ya-Na’s development legacy
5 hours -
RANA asks Parliament to restrict MP Yakubu Mohammed child engagements until safeguarding training is completed
5 hours -
Rights group warns against exposing schoolgirl to fallout from MP’s comment
5 hours -
Family of Bukom crash victim visits Gender Minister ahead of funeral
5 hours -
An apology is not a safeguarding policy – RANA demands Parliament’s action over MP’s comment to schoolgirl
5 hours -
Prince Adu-Owusu: The August that changed everything
6 hours -
Ato Forson announces ‘New Economy’ policy for 2027 budget, promises shift to growth-focused spending
6 hours