Audio By Carbonatix
The US Supreme Court temporarily allowed President Donald Trump to enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military while legal challenges to the policy move forward.
Shortly after taking office in January, Trump signed a pair of executive orders that enabled the Pentagon to implement the ban.
But a lower federal court blocked the policy in March, ruling that the administration had failed to provide evidence that transgender troops posed a threat to military effectiveness.
In an emergency application to the court, the Trump administration argued that the lower court should show deference to the military's judgement in matters of national defence.
The court's three liberal justices objected to the stay, which arrived via an unsigned order on Tuesday.
Trump's executive order declared that identifying as transgender "conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honourable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle" and would hamper military preparedness.
In February, the Department of Defense announced it would begin discharging currently serving transgender personnel.
Seven servicemembers, including Commander Emily Schilling, a Navy fighter pilot, swiftly challenged the ban, along with a transgender individual seeking to enlist.
The plaintiffs argued that the ban "undermines military readiness, endangers our safety, and violates the United States Constitution"."
"Today's Supreme Court ruling is a devastating blow to transgender servicemembers who have demonstrated their capabilities and commitment to our nation's defense," Lambda Legal and the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, which are representing the plaintiffs, said in a joint statement.
"By allowing this discriminatory ban to take effect while our challenge continues, the Court has temporarily sanctioned a policy that has nothing to do with military readiness and everything to do with prejudice," it said.
In March, a federal judge in Washington state ordered a nationwide halt on the administration's ban, saying the government failed to show it would enhance "unit cohesion, good order or discipline".
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals did not block the lower court's ruling, keeping the injunction in place.
With the Supreme Court order, that pause will lift while the servicemembers' lawsuit makes its way through lower courts.
White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt called the order "another massive victory in the Supreme Court".
Early in his second term, Trump took a series of actions that have significantly impacted transgender individuals, whose gender identity does not correspond to the sex assigned to them at birth.
He signed an executive order declaring the US would only recognise two sexes - male and female.
The order has had far reaching implications for transgender Americans, especially those seeking to obtain official documentation.
The State Department announced in February that it would no longer allow applicants to choose "X" for their gender on their US passport, but instead must choose "male" or "female" based on their sex assigned at birth.
The passport policy is the subject of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of a group of transgender and nonbinary individuals. In mid-April, a federal judge issued an injunction on the passport policy while the case proceeds.
The administration has also pushed for policies to restrict certain kinds of healthcare for minors who identify as transgender, and to prevent transgender women from playing on women's sports teams.
Latest Stories
-
MiDA CEO pays courtesy call on Gender Minister to deepen collaboration
18 minutes -
Open Kasoa–Winneba middle carriageway in 3–4 weeks – Mahama directs contractor
24 minutes -
Akosombo Substation Fire: Energy Ministry assures swift response and public safety
25 minutes -
Food insecurity 10 times higher among uneducated households — GSS
41 minutes -
1 in 5 households spend over 75% of income on food as cost pressures mount — GSS
53 minutes -
South Africa expresses regret, promises probe into xenophobic attack on Ghanaians – Ablakwa
1 hour -
EU backs Ghana’s poultry scheme with 150,000 birds for 3,000 farmers
1 hour -
Pressure by CSOs on Mahama over OSP case constitutes ‘emotional blackmail’ – Dafeamekpor
1 hour -
Ghana summons South African envoy over reported xenophobic attacks
2 hours -
Philanthropist, Akonta Felix Akakpo promises 300-second cycle scholarships in Ketu South Municipality
2 hours -
Banker in court for allegedly stealing GH¢12m, blowing GH¢600K on online betting
2 hours -
EOCO affidavit clarifies that Gabriel Tanko Atokple was not declared “wanted”
2 hours -
Fire outbreak at Akosombo Substation disrupts power supply – GRIDCo
2 hours -
Bank of Ghana fails to publish 2025 financial statements in violation of BoG Act
2 hours -
CEOs must act boldly as Ghana faces a defining economic moment – McDan
2 hours