
Audio By Carbonatix
A US judge has once again blocked President Donald Trump from implementing an executive order ending birthright citizenship for some US residents as a legal challenge moves forward.
A New Hampshire judge approved a class action lawsuit against Trump's executive order and temporarily stopped the president's order from taking effect.
The class action lawsuit was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of immigrant parents and their infants.
The decision comes weeks after the Supreme Court introduced limits on how and when universal injunctions are issued by federal courts. However, the decision still allows them through certain legal avenues.
The class action suit was introduced after the Supreme Court decision, in keeping with the new standards set by the court.
Still, the White House challenged the validity of the judge's ruling.
"Today's decision is an obvious and unlawful attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court's clear order against universal relief. This judge's decision disregards the rule of law by abusing class action certification procedures," spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement Thursday. "The Trump Administration will be fighting vigorously against the attempts of these rogue district court judges to impede the policies President Trump was elected to implement."
The US Constitution guarantees citizenship to all born on US soil, but Trump has sought to revoke that right for babies born to undocumented immigrants and foreign visitors, as part of his crackdown on immigration.
The class-action lawsuit seeks to challenge the order as harmful and unconstitutional, and the judge ruled that it can proceed on behalf of the babies who would be affected by the restrictions.
The ruling also once again pauses an order that was a priority for Trump. The judge has given the government seven days to appeal.
Restricting birthright citizenship was one of his first actions in office.
Multiple courts across the US issued nationwide injunctions as they considered legal challenges to the order.
The Trump administration appealed those temporary holds to the highest US court, arguing judges did not have the authority to block a presidential order nationally while the courts considered the cases.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority sided with Trump in a 6-3 ruling that broadly curtailed judicial power, though the justices did not address the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order.
Following the Supreme Court's decision, Trump's order had been set to take effect on 27 July.
Latest Stories
-
Russia, Ghana trade volume rises to over $800m as Moscow seeks deeper cooperation
5 minutes -
GIFMIS trains Social Investment Fund staff to strengthen public financial management
9 minutes -
Why is one judge handling several NPP cases? – Former MP questions Wontumi trial
9 minutes -
AU Commissioner calls for better pay to retain Africa’s health professionals
9 minutes -
Ati-Zigi tops World Cup goals prevented rankings after Ghana’s campaign
15 minutes -
Producer price inflation for June 2026 drops to 3.5%
23 minutes -
National Service Authority denies authorising allowance deductions, says NASPA approved GH¢60 charge
28 minutes -
African leaders call for greater domestic health financing to build resilient health systems
33 minutes -
National development requires strong values and collective action – Julius Debrah
51 minutes -
Ambassador to SheaPark Resource Hub Project celebrates Shea Day with Buipe Wura
52 minutes -
Kumasi Evangel Choir donates GH¢21,000 to support child cancer care at KATH
56 minutes -
Are walkouts in parliament truly democratic?
59 minutes -
NPP Chairmanship race: Party yet to determine Wontumi’s fate
1 hour -
Lebanese army says troops deploying in ‘pilot zone’ after Israeli withdrawal
1 hour -
Two-thirds of people living with HIV are in sub-Saharan Africa – AU Commissioner
1 hour