Audio By Carbonatix
Lawyers of former Health Minister Dr Sipa Yankey are unimpressed with the decision by the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) to indefinitely suspend hearing into the controversial Mabey and Johnson (M&J) bribery scandal.
Lead counsel Yaw Boateng Gyan says they will take all appropriate legal options for CHRAJ to hear and investigate the case of their client who, together with five ex-government officials, has been indicted for taking bribes from British construction firm Mabey and Johnson.
The anti-corruption institution was forced to truncate an investigation into the alleged bribery scandal due to a myriad of challenges raised by lawyers of the accused persons.
They contend that CHRAJ, per the country’s constitution, has no mandate to investigate bribery allegations against non-public officials.
Lawyers for the accused persons - Baba Kamara, Ato Quarshie, Kwame Peprah, Boniface Saddique - filed a writ at the High Court prohibiting CHRAJ to investigate the matter. They accused the commissioner, Emile Short, of making prejudicial comments during a television show.
On Thursday, the commission announced it had suspended investigation into the matter indefinitely.
But Mr Boateng Gyan told Joy News CHRAJ’s declaration is inimical to the paramount interest of their client.
According to him, the people named to have benefited from the bribe monies were named in their individual capacities and that it stands to reason they must fight individually to clear their names.
He was emphatic his client did not challenge the jurisdiction of CHRAJ to investigate the matter, nor did he file a writ in court to prohibit the anti-corruption institution from hearing the matter.
CHRAJ owes it a duty to hear his client, who like the other accused persons, has a right which must be protected, he argued.
As far as Lawyer Gyan is concerned, his client, innocent of the bribery allegations leveled against him, resigned his position as the Health Minister; he prays CHRAJ will hear the case of his client.
“After a thorough review of the case, we will file the appropriate court processes to compel CHRAJ to hear our case,” he stated.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Five-year-old boy dies after getting caught in ski travelator
26 minutes -
‘This is an abuse of trust’- PUWU-TUC slams gov’t over ECG privatisation plans
28 minutes -
Children should be protected from home fires – GNFS
33 minutes -
Volta Regional Minister urges unity, respect for Chief Imam’s ruling after Ho central mosque shooting
37 minutes -
$214M in gold-for-reserves programme not a loss, Parliament’s economy chair insists it’s a transactional cost
1 hour -
Elegant homes estate unveils ultra-modern sports complex in Katamanso
1 hour -
ECG can be salvaged without private investors -TUC Deputy Secretary-General
1 hour -
Two pilots killed after mid-air helicopter collision in New Jersey
2 hours -
2025 in Review: Fire, power and the weight of return (January – March)
2 hours -
Washington DC NPP chairman signals bid for USA chairmanship
2 hours -
Sheikh Ali Muniru remains Volta regional Imam, says National chief Imam
2 hours -
GoldBod CEO accuses Minority of hypocrisy over Gold-for-Reserves losses
3 hours -
Sammy Gyamfi to address alleged losses under gold for reserves programme on Jan 5
3 hours -
BoG–GoldBod $214m hit is design failure, not market loss – Minority
3 hours -
Festive season sees minor fires, but domestic cases hit 15–20 daily – GNFS
3 hours
