Audio By Carbonatix
Another battle between the Electoral Commission (EC) and the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) looms over how to implement a Supreme Court verdict ordering the removal of ineligible voters.
The Commission has indicated it will use the Voter Exhibition exercise to implement the order, but the NPP has raised questions about the constitutionality of this plan.
Lawyer Nana Asante Bediatuo, who secured a Supreme Court order on behalf of his clients, said he was “a bit baffled” by the EC’s plans.
Photo: Nana Asante Bediatuo, counsel for two politicians who went to court
The Supreme Court ruling Thursday directed that identities of deceased voters and those who used the NHIS card to register are to be expunged.
By the EC’s estimation, there are almost 600,000 dead voters on the roll for the polls. It remains to be seen how many voters registered with the NHIS card which the Supreme Court ruled in 2014 as illegal means of registering.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court says the removal must be done immediately.
According to the Deputy EC Chair, Georgina Amankwah, the earliest opportunity to do this is in June when the register will be publicly exhibited to allow voters to check if their names are indeed captured in the register.
The exhibition process will also allow a person to challenge the inclusion of names suspected to be ineligible.
But according to Nana Asante Bediatuo, if the EC used this process to implement a court order, it would be illegal.
The lawyer explained that the exhibition process puts the responsibility of identifying ineligible voters on private individuals.
But referring to the court order, Nana Asante Bediatuo said the EC must by itself identify and delete the names.
He explained that during the hearings, the Electoral Commission told the Supreme Court that it could identify those who used the NHIS card to register by examining a registration document, Form 1 A.
“So if they are still talking about using the exhibition process…that would be in my view a violation of the court order”, he argued.
The NPP has employed every legal means to press home demands for a validation of the voters’ register which all stakeholders admit is bloated.
For more than a year, the main opposition party in concert with pro-NPP pressure groups and the Peoples’ National Convention (PNC) have used demonstration and court action to compel the EC.

Photo: Pro-NPP group, Let My Vote Count Alliance, demonstrated in September 2015 demanding for a new voters' register
Any disagreement over how to implement the Supreme Court order could unsurprisingly end up in another court action.
Latest Stories
-
Politician Attorney General model is broken and no longer credible – Constitution Review Chair
1 hour -
Indonesians raise white flags as anger grows over slow flood aid
2 hours -
Why passport stamps may be a thing of the past
2 hours -
Pope Leo urges ‘courage’ to end Ukraine war in first Christmas address
2 hours -
Commentary on Noah Adamtey v Attorney General: A constitutional challenge to Office of Special Prosecutor
2 hours -
Ghana’s democratic debate is too insular and afraid of change – Constitution Review Chair
2 hours -
24/7 campaigning is a choice, not democracy – Constitution Review Chair
3 hours -
4 years is too short as Ghana lags behind global democratic standards – Constitution Review Chair
3 hours -
GOLDBOD CEO explains ‘Clear Typo’ in Foreign Reserves claim
5 hours -
Trump says US military struck ISIS terrorists in Nigeria
6 hours -
Players can only leave if replacements come in – Amorim
8 hours -
Newcastle stadium plans in limbo – Howe
8 hours -
Civil society group calls on BoG to suspend planned normalisation of non-interest banking
8 hours -
King Charles’ Christmas message urges unity in divided world
8 hours -
Jingle bills: Arkansas Powerball player strikes $1.8bn jackpot on Christmas Eve
8 hours
