Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction in the Epic v. Apple case on Friday morning, putting new restrictions on Apple’s App Store rules and bringing months of bitter legal jousting to a conclusion.
Under the new order, Apple is:
permanently restrained and enjoined from prohibiting developers from including in their apps and their metadata buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to In-App Purchasing and communicating with customers through points of contact obtained voluntarily from customers through account registration within the app.
In short, iOS apps must be allowed to direct users to payment options beyond those offered by Apple. The injunction is scheduled to take effect in 90 days — on December 9th — unless it is enjoined by a higher court.
In a separate judgment, the court affirmed that Epic Games was in breach of its contract with Apple when it implemented the alternative payment system in the Fortnite app. As a result, Epic must pay Apple 30 percent of all revenue collected through the system since it was implemented — a sum of more than $3.5 million.
In the full ruling, Judge Gonzalez Rogers explained her thinking on the issue in greater detail. Notably, the judge rejected both parties’ definition of the marketplace at issue in the case.
“The relevant market here is digital mobile gaming transactions, not gaming generally and not Apple’s own internal operating systems related to the App Store,” Gonzalez Rogers wrote.
Under that market definition, “the court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,” she continued. “Nonetheless, the trial did show that Apple is engaging in anti-competitive conduct under California’s competition laws.”
Reached for comment, Apple cast the ruling as a victory for the App Store model.
“Today the Court has affirmed what we’ve known all along: the App Store is not in violation of antitrust law,” a representative said. “Apple faces rigorous competition in every segment in which we do business, and we believe customers and developers choose us because our products and services are the best in the world. We remain committed to ensuring the App Store is a safe and trusted marketplace.”
On Twitter, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney expressed disappointment in the order. “Today’s ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers,” Sweeney said. “Epic is fighting for fair competition among in-app payment methods and app stores for a billion consumers.” Separately, an Epic Games spokesperson told NPR that the company plans to appeal.
The new restrictions include echoes of some provisional anti-steering restrictions already placed on Apple outside of the US.
On September 1st, Apple agreed to allow outside signup links for “reader” apps like Netflix and Spotify, following a regulatory investigation in Japan. More recently, a South Korean law opened the door to alternate payment systems, although the practical impacts of the law are still unclear.
Apple and Epic Games have been at odds for years over the transaction fee system in the iOS App Store, which Apple sees as a necessary operating cost but Epic sees as a monopolistic tax.
The fight came to a head in August 2020 when Epic installed an alternative payment system in Fortnite to circumvent the App Store’s transaction fees. Apple responded by removing Fortnite from the App Store, which sparked an immediate legal complaint from Epic.
The subsequent trial was a brutal tug-of-war over the App Store model and Apple’s efforts to maintain control over software on iOS. Among other things, we learned about Apple’s strange accounting methods and charm offensive to keep major players like Netflix using in-app purchases.
The ruling is likely to have significant impacts outside of Apple. Google is already facing a similar lawsuit from Epic Games over its own efforts to maintain the Google Play Store as the central source of software on Android, drawing on elaborate deals with phone manufacturers.
Latest Stories
-
Police foil armed robbery attempt in Accra, two suspects killed
12 minutes -
PURC forces reconnection, resolves water utility dispute in Tamale
15 minutes -
Parliament passes Ghana Medical Trust Fund Bill
29 minutes -
Chinese firms explore opportunities under Ghana’s 24- Hour Economy programme
34 minutes -
Dr Zanetor Agyeman-Rawlings joins Ghana’s delegation to Pan African Parliament
39 minutes -
Forum in Mali sparks debate on Africa’s historical claims for reparations
40 minutes -
Northern Region: PURC resolves consumer utility concerns with innovative outreach programmes
40 minutes -
Ghana likely to end 2025 with inflation rate in single digit – Deloitte
41 minutes -
German Development Cooperation marks milestone in boosting digital job prospects for Ghanaian youth
43 minutes -
Kofi A. Tawiah Foundation to host character education training for educators in northern Ghana
43 minutes -
Newmont completes GH₵ 95m Hwidiem–Kenyasi road; commits $34m to boost Ahafo South infrastructure
51 minutes -
Three poachers arrested in Ankasa Conservation area after failed bribery attempt
58 minutes -
Sekondi court grants bail in 12-year-old assault case
1 hour -
ConShip joins line-up for JoySports Invitational Tournament 2025
1 hour -
Apple set to stave off daily fines, EU to accept App Store changes, sources say
1 hour