Former Deputy Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Diana Asonaba Dapaah, has criticised President John Mahama’s decision to suspend Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, describing it as a breach of the Constitution.
Speaking in an interview on Asempa FM’s Ekosii Sen, Mrs Dapaah stated that there was no legal basis for establishing a prima facie case against the Chief Justice.
“My position has been that there is no basis whatsoever for finding a prima facie case in respect of at least the three petitions that have come,” she said.
She rejected claims that President Mahama had followed due process, insisting that his actions violated constitutional provisions.
“I do not agree with anyone who says the President used due process to remove the Chief Justice. I believe President Mahama has sinned against the Constitution,” she stressed.
Mrs Dapaah explained that under the Constitution, when the President determines a prima facie case against a Chief Justice, he may set up a committee to investigate further.
However, she stated that this discretionary power must not be abused.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2014056569089403
“The fact that the Constitution uses the word ‘may’ means the President’s decision is not automatic. It should not be based on prejudice, and it must be subjected to constitutional checks,” she said, referencing Article 296 of the Constitution.
According to her, if the President had been transparent, he would have provided clear reasons for establishing a prima facie case, but he failed to do so.
“The President should have given reasons for the prima facie case. Without those reasons, it is very grave,” she said.
She further explained that even though the President has the right to suspend a Chief Justice once a prima facie case is established, that discretion can still be reviewed constitutionally.
“The fact that the President’s discretion can be subjected to constitutional review still stands. So it is wrong to suggest that once the President acts, he cannot be questioned,” she said.
Mrs Dapaah cited the precedent of Agyei Twum’s case to support her argument that presidential discretion must be exercised fairly and transparently.
Her comments come in the wake of widespread public and legal debate over the suspension, with many questioning the transparency, motives, and procedural fairness of the President’s decision.
Latest Stories
-
Corruption thriving on systemic loopholes – Prof. Ali-Nakyea
20 minutes -
Education Minister inaugurates boards of CTVET and Ghana Library Authority
21 minutes -
The private sector fuels corruption; must be held to ethical standards – Prof Ali-Nakyea
35 minutes -
Volta NPP grassroots declare support for Bryan Acheampong as unifying force ahead of 2028
45 minutes -
2025 National Girls in ICT: Volta Regional Minister leads charge for inclusive digital empowerment
52 minutes -
Cassona launches international recruitment drive to boost healthcare talent in Sub-Saharan Africa
53 minutes -
Constitution Review Secretariat to engage Ghanaians abroad on June 28
1 hour -
Tax expert Prof. Ali-Nakyea questions tax-free lavish gifts received by pastors
1 hour -
UG Corporate Football League: NPA meets Forestry in decisive Group B showdown
1 hour -
Communication Minister urges girls to embrace digital power at 2025 National Girls in ICT
1 hour -
MTN Ghana reaffirms commitment to digital inclusion with GH₵17.6m support for Girls in ICT
2 hours -
Vincent Assafuah petitions Mahama over ‘desecration’ of Independence Square by foreign gay couple
2 hours -
Ronaldo signs new deal with Saudi club Al-Nassr
2 hours -
Gov’t committed to passing Non-Profit Bill to regulate civil society – Veep
2 hours -
Kotoko, Hearts set for Super Clash in President’s Cup showdown
2 hours