Audio By Carbonatix
Private legal practitioner Sheila Minkah-Premo, has cautioned against depriving surviving relatives, especially spouses, of their entitlements from a deceased person’s estate.
According to her, it is a crime punishable by law to remove, destroy, or otherwise unlawfully interfere with the property of the deceased person and deprive the entitled person of the use of the property.
Speaking on JoyNews' The Law, Mrs Minkah-Premo said, “as a practitioner, 30 something years afterwards, we still have people coming to our office, telling us that as soon as the husband dies they [deceased's family] come locking up the door, taking the private car, to the family house."
She told Samson Lardy Anyenini on Sunday that "people are still doing these things. So if you deprive any beneficiary of any part or interfere then you are violating the law."
The Chairperson of the Executive Council of Leadership and Advocacy for Women in Africa (LAWA Ghana) stated that if a person commits such an offence, they are liable on summary conviction to a fine of not less than 700 penalty units and not more than 1000 penalties units as per the 2018 Intestate Succession Act.
They could also be liable to a term of imprisonment of not less than two years or more than four years or both (fine and imprisonment).
This means a person will be fined about GHS8,400 minimum and GHS12,000 or be jailed for two years minimum or four years maximum or both, Mrs Minkah-Premo explained.
In addition, she said that the court can also call for a reinstatement of the person who was ejected or reimbursement of the property.
Also, before the distribution of the estate of an interstate, if a person locks up and/or takes possession of the household property within the matrimonial home after one spouse passes away, they are also committing a crime, Mrs Minkah-Premo said.
“The household properties belong to the surviving spouse and children, so if you take any of it you are liable to a summary conviction to a fine of not less than 250 penalty units and not more than 500 penalty units and also to a term of imprisonment of not less than two years and not more than four years,” she added.
However, she stated that for both crimes, many experts have argued that the punishment needs to be a lot stronger or more than what the Interstate law currently states.
Mrs Minkah-Premo explained that this is because the practice of taking advantage of surviving spouses is rampant in society.
“Maybe if it is further enhanced, hopefully, in the 2021 version of the Intestate Succession Bill, I think that it will be good. It is really very common. It is a time when a person is most vulnerable, you’ve lost the spouse, you are vulnerable and the family comes at you.”
Latest Stories
-
UEW journalism students call for practical media studio
54 seconds -
Beyond certification: How Bawaa the artist is helping young creatives turn talent into opportunity
9 minutes -
The Law 101: Vacation warrants and the role of the CJ (Part IV)
25 minutes -
The Law 101: GBA states pure law and convention about Legal Vacation (Part III)
30 minutes -
Pray – THE LAW 101: The Vacation Roster dilemma and the reality of Court Recess (Part II)
47 minutes -
Trump hid in catering truck in secret plane swap over Iran threat, reports say
53 minutes -
Inside the Secret Service ‘shell game’ to hide US presidents in plain sight
55 minutes -
GEA seeks Gender Ministry’s support for Female Future Programme
1 hour -
Driver beaten to death over misunderstanding at Gomoa Achiase
1 hour -
Bagre Dam spillage: 68 communities in Northern region alerted as Burkina Faso monitors water levels
1 hour -
ECG announces power outages in Central, Eastern and Western Regions on Thursday
1 hour -
THE LAW 101: Tempus Non Currit – Why the sacred silence of the Legal Vacation protects justice (Part I)
2 hours -
God does not take campaign instructions
2 hours -
Government moves to address rising accommodation costs at KNUST
2 hours -
Cristiano Ronaldo marries longtime love Georgina Rodríguez in Portugal
3 hours