Audio By Carbonatix
This is the first time in my life as a constitutional law scholar and lawyer, trained in the Anglo-American legal tradition, that I am learning that in order to be allowed permission to file an amicus curiae brief, one must be "neutral" or disinterested in the case in question.
This is the exact opposite of everything I know about amicus briefs. Typically, one who is not otherwise a party to a case before an appellate or apex court must demonstrate a strong "interest" in the matter in order to be allowed the opportunity to submit an amicus brief. Why would a person who is disinterested or neutral even bother to file an amicus brief?
Especially in Ghana, where Article 2 of the Constitution entitles any citizen, natural or artificial, to bring a constitutional case before the Supreme Court without having to show personal grievance or special interest, the idea that, once a certain party has already brought a matter, the outcome of which binds all citizens equally, no other person may file an amicus in the matter unless they are "neutral" (whatever that means) is simply illogical and, indeed, turns Article 2 on its head.
That means, any person with a lawyer can just race to the Court to file an article 2 case, essentially binding all of us (which is what a case with constitutional consequence means in effect), and, simply by being first to file that case, essentially prevent all other equally interested (and affected) citizens from submitting an amicus brief in the same matter.
Me Lord!!!!
"Another member of the panel Justice Baffoe Bonnie said the court was well aware of what the CSOs had been up to and is quite aware of their position on the matter.
He said the processes filed shows they are not coming to assist the court with any new information useful to concluding the matter but rather coming to support a side.
He remarked, “you are not neutral”, adding that they would have better served their interests if they had joined the party in the case they were actually supporting."
***
The writer, Prof. H Kwesi Prempeh is a Legal Practitioner and Executive Director of the Centre for Democratic Development, Ghana (CDD-Ghana)
Latest Stories
-
Fifa scraps controversial World Cup investment plan
3 hours -
WAFCON 2026: South Africa fight back to earn dramatic draw against Côte d’Ivoire
4 hours -
We should not over-commercialise football – Eric Alagidede
4 hours -
GFA should reject FIFA’s World Cup sale proposal – Eric Alagidede
4 hours -
Ghanaian woman jailed 5 years in US for $1.6million romance scam
4 hours -
Parliament passes Energy Sector Levies Amendment Bill to tighten fuel subsidy regime
5 hours -
Unique by Design project launched to promote disability inclusion in Ghana’s fashion industry
7 hours -
Joseph Paul Amoah finishes seventh in Commonwealth Games 200m final
7 hours -
Mahama urges Dagbon Regent to preserve peace and continue late Ya-Na’s development legacy
7 hours -
RANA asks Parliament to restrict MP Yakubu Mohammed child engagements until safeguarding training is completed
7 hours -
Rights group warns against exposing schoolgirl to fallout from MP’s comment
7 hours -
Family of Bukom crash victim visits Gender Minister ahead of funeral
7 hours -
An apology is not a safeguarding policy – RANA demands Parliament’s action over MP’s comment to schoolgirl
7 hours -
Prince Adu-Owusu: The August that changed everything
8 hours -
Ato Forson announces ‘New Economy’ policy for 2027 budget, promises shift to growth-focused spending
8 hours