There is growing support to generally exclude the short-term debt from the restructuring perimeter, a Progress Report by the International Monetary Fund has revealed.
This means Treasury bills will not be affected by any debt restructuring despite the rising interest rates.
The Fund at a Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable in the ongoing spring meetings in Morocco said the exclusion of short-term debt is a common practice under Paris Club treatments and an explicit feature of the Common Framework.
“It is therefore important for restructuring countries as it helps maintain access to trade finance.
In recent and ongoing restructuring cases, including outside the Common Framework, the Fund, pointed out that the practice has similarly excluded short-term debt from restructuring perimeters”.
On the treatment of State Owned Enterprise debt, the Fund added that some participants suggested the exclusion of government-guaranteed debt of financially viable SOEs from the restructuring perimeter. Others underlined that, typically for low-income countries, the joint IMF-World Bank Debt Sustainability (DSA) Analyses include this debt in the DSA perimeter, with limited exceptions.
They recalled that the creditors and the restructuring country can always agree on a restructuring perimeter that differs from the DSA perimeter.
However, in doing so, the discussion would likely raise sensitive issues of burden sharing as the exclusion of some debt would require more effort on the debt remaining in the restructuring perimeter.
Restructuring Parameters
The IMF said cutoff dates are key for the restructuring process but also an important parameter to protect new financing to the restructuring country, including emergency support.
“As such, having early clarity on the cutoff date is critical. That said, flexibility seems warranted to account for case-specific circumstances”, it stressed.
“In practice, in recent restructuring cases, cutoff dates have been decided case-by-case by creditors, generally not later than the date of the staff-level agreement (SLA) reached between the authorities and IMF staff on an IMF-supported program, which protects new financing provided after the SLA”, it added.
In practice, the Common Framework includes three parameters to assess enforcing comparability of treatment (CoT), which build on Paris Club practices the changes in nominal debt service over the IMF program period; where applicable, the debt reduction in net present value terms; and the extension of the duration of the treated claims.
However, the Common Framework doesn’t specify which formula should be used to assess “the debt reduction in net present value terms”, nor the discount rate to be used to calculate the Net Present Value.
Latest Stories
-
Photos of 2024 Aboakyer Festival
27 mins -
#JustTurned18: I now have an opportunity to use my thumb to bring someone into power – Excited prospective voters
55 mins -
OSP acted as a whistleblower transferring Cecilia Dapaah’s case to EOCO – Sammy Darko
59 mins -
IMF calls for tariff adjustment for energy sector cost recovery
1 hour -
Samson’s Take: Journalists, block the pretentious idiots
3 hours -
Real Madrid crowned LaLiga champions after Barcelona’s defeat at Girona
3 hours -
Daniel Otting Awuah elected SRC President of Ghana School of Law
4 hours -
Lawrence Ati-Zigi signs St. Gallen contract extension
4 hours -
We should be careful not to destroy our institutions without just cause – Serebour Quaicoe
4 hours -
Cecilia Dapaah’s case: EOCO hasn’t requested FBI report – Office of the Special Prosecutor
6 hours -
Andre Ayew scores 5th league goal as Le Havre beat Strasbourg
6 hours -
Ejisu by-election: NPP didn’t sanction money distribution to voters – Richard Ahiagbah
7 hours -
Ghana Health Service opens vacancies for 204 doctors, 25 dentists
7 hours -
Domestic tourism on the rebound with 1.4m visits to attraction sites in 2023 – GTA
8 hours -
Government working hard to complete Tema General Hospital project – Dr Okoe Boye
8 hours