Audio By Carbonatix
The Ghana Bar Association (GBA) says the Office of Special Prosecutor (OSP) should have exhausted all the legal processes before resorting to the court of public opinion when it disagreed with certain rulings of the court.
According to the Public Relations Officer of GBA, Saviour Kudze, the law allows individuals who do not agree with its rulings to appeal or apply for a review.
Speaking on Newsnight on Joy FM, he explained that since the Special Prosecutor, Kissi Agybeng had a legal background, he should have applied the law.
“Well, the position we [GBA] have is that his approach is not the most appropriate. He is a seasoned lawyer, he has gone to court and the court of first instance had delivered decision not in his favour.
“I would have expected him to exhaust the legal process maybe by filing an appeal against the decision of the court of first instance even up to the Supreme Court and even invoke the review jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.”
Mr Kudze referenced an instance in Dr Stephen Opuni's case where the Attorney General went to the Court of Appeal after a High Court judge, Justice Kwasi Anokye Gyimah said it would be unfair for him to adopt a proceeding that was "saddled" with numerous allegations, and therefore ruled that the court will no longer rely on records gathered since 2017 and would therefore start afresh.
Read also: Opuni trial will no longer start afresh – Court of Appeal
On the back of this, he said the OSP should have exhausted the law before calling for a press conference.
He continued “Now the OSP may have powers but in enforcing those powers he must also observe procedures. For instance, if you are an employee of an organization and the organization has a handbook or manual that details step-by-step procedures to be observed before dismissing a staff and there is evidence that the staff has misconducted himself and yet they did not follow the procedure before dismissing him, when that dismissal gets to court- the case will go against the organization. So I think that he should have exhausted the legal process before coming out.
“Even if the allegation is that judges have ganged up against his office, once he has evidence, he could have had a process to lead this evidence in the superior court for the court to determine.”
Latest Stories
-
Coconut Grove Regency CEO urges deliberate tourism, better sanitation and local production
18 minutes -
Bosome Freho MP reveals how Dr Bawumia “quietly” funded tiling of Pentecost Church
35 minutes -
34 injured as bus crashes at Asuboi on Accra–Kumasi Highway
1 hour -
Galamsey: NAIMOS arrests foreign nationals, cleans up Birim River
2 hours -
Man captured in viral video assaulting lady remanded amid fresh sextortion allegations
3 hours -
Around 1,500 soldiers on standby for deployment to Minneapolis, officials say
4 hours -
Faisal Islam: Trump’s Greenland threats to allies are without parallel
4 hours -
Ex-GBA President accuses NDC of driving move to remove GBA from constitution
6 hours -
Trump’s double pardon underscores sweeping use of clemency
7 hours -
Morocco and Senegal set for defining AFCON final under Rabat lights today
8 hours -
Trump tariff threat over Greenland ‘unacceptable’, European leaders say
9 hours -
Evalue-Ajomoro-Gwira MP kicks against VALCO sale
9 hours -
Mercy Johnson withdraws alleged defamation case against TikToker
10 hours -
Ghana accepted Trump’s deported West Africans and forced them back to their native countries
10 hours -
No evidence of theft in Unibank Case – A‑G explains withdrawal of charges against Dr Duffour
10 hours
