Audio By Carbonatix
The Ghana Bar Association (GBA) says the Office of Special Prosecutor (OSP) should have exhausted all the legal processes before resorting to the court of public opinion when it disagreed with certain rulings of the court.
According to the Public Relations Officer of GBA, Saviour Kudze, the law allows individuals who do not agree with its rulings to appeal or apply for a review.
Speaking on Newsnight on Joy FM, he explained that since the Special Prosecutor, Kissi Agybeng had a legal background, he should have applied the law.
“Well, the position we [GBA] have is that his approach is not the most appropriate. He is a seasoned lawyer, he has gone to court and the court of first instance had delivered decision not in his favour.
“I would have expected him to exhaust the legal process maybe by filing an appeal against the decision of the court of first instance even up to the Supreme Court and even invoke the review jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.”
Mr Kudze referenced an instance in Dr Stephen Opuni's case where the Attorney General went to the Court of Appeal after a High Court judge, Justice Kwasi Anokye Gyimah said it would be unfair for him to adopt a proceeding that was "saddled" with numerous allegations, and therefore ruled that the court will no longer rely on records gathered since 2017 and would therefore start afresh.
Read also: Opuni trial will no longer start afresh – Court of Appeal
On the back of this, he said the OSP should have exhausted the law before calling for a press conference.
He continued “Now the OSP may have powers but in enforcing those powers he must also observe procedures. For instance, if you are an employee of an organization and the organization has a handbook or manual that details step-by-step procedures to be observed before dismissing a staff and there is evidence that the staff has misconducted himself and yet they did not follow the procedure before dismissing him, when that dismissal gets to court- the case will go against the organization. So I think that he should have exhausted the legal process before coming out.
“Even if the allegation is that judges have ganged up against his office, once he has evidence, he could have had a process to lead this evidence in the superior court for the court to determine.”
Latest Stories
-
A Tax for Galamsey: The anger against illegal mining is not enough – Ken Ashigbey
17 minutes -
A Tax for Galamsey: There is a president who is determined to fight this canker – Elikem Kotoko
24 minutes -
Galamsey: Ken Ashigbey calls for arrest of Tano North MCE over prospective licence issuance
29 minutes -
FDA clamps down on unregistered diaper products in Ho Market
35 minutes -
Beyond the Hills: A different story unfolds at Ashesi University
42 minutes -
Cocoa sector crisis has exposed the NDC government – Dr Amin Adam
56 minutes -
A Tax for Galamsey: Gov’t should’ve been more decisive, prompt in their action – Daryl Bosu
1 hour -
Ken Ashigbey urges more investigative journalism to curb galamsey
1 hour -
Dr Gideon Boako announces reconstruction of Yamfo Market
1 hour -
Norway’s former PM charged with gross corruption over Epstein links
1 hour -
Minority urges gov’t to restore promised cocoa price
1 hour -
Politicisation of Cocobod led to its crisis – Prof Prempeh
1 hour -
A Tax for Galamsey: Ashanti Reg. Min. calls for ‘natural justice’ over calls to interdict Amansie DCE
2 hours -
A Tax for Galamsey: Investigations are underway, wrongdoers will be punished – Ashanti Regional Minister
2 hours -
‘Blend Festival’ hosts Wiyaala, Maami
2 hours
