Audio By Carbonatix
The US Department of State has unveiled new rules to deter pregnant women from travelling to the US to give birth.
The policy takes effect on Friday and is intended as a crackdown on what is known as "birth tourism".
Under the rule, pregnant women applying for US visitor visas may need to prove they have a specific reason for travel other than giving birth on US soil.
Nearly any child born in the US gets automatic citizenship - a law US President Donald Trump has criticised.
His administration says the new travel policy is necessary to safeguard US national security and public health.
Mr Trump has sought to limit immigration to the US, and has previously questioned the US constitutional amendment that grants citizenship to "all persons born or naturalised in the United States".
Conservatives have long decried so-called anchor babies, born in the US to parents who are seeking to live in America.
The practice of obtaining a visa to the US on the basis of having other US relatives is known as "chain migration", a policy that has also been criticised by Mr Trump.
What is the new rule?
The new rule applies to visitors seeking B visas, which are issued to non-immigrants. It allows consular officials to deny a visa to any individual whose "primary purpose" in obtaining such documentation is to give birth there. "The final rule addresses concerns about the attendant risks of this activity to national security and law enforcement, including criminal activity associated with the birth tourism industry, as reflected in federal prosecutions of individuals and entities involved in that industry," the Department of State said. "The birth tourism industry is also rife with criminal activity, including international criminal schemes," the policy adds. It also tightens rules on those wishing to enter the US for medical treatment. Visa applicants must now prove they have "the means and intent" to pay for their medical expenses, and convince a consular officer that they have arranged for a doctor willing to provide their treatment. The White House applauded the new rule. The president's press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, said in a statement that "the birth tourism industry threatens to overburden valuable hospital resources and is rife with criminal activity". "Closing this glaring immigration loophole will combat these endemic abuses and ultimately protect the United States from the national security risks created by this practice," she added.How many children are born under 'birth tourism'?
There are no records of how many babies are born to US visitors each year, but various groups have issued estimates. About 10,000 babies were born to a foreign resident in 2017, the latest year that data is available, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That number is up from about 7,800 in 2007. The Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for stricter immigration laws, estimates that about 33,000 children were born to women on temporary tourist visas between the second half of 2016 and the first half of 2017. Currently, pregnant women can enter the US even up until birth, according to US Customs and Border Protection. But the prospective mother's travel may be restricted if there is reason to believe she intends to remain in the US beyond the time allowed by her visa, or plans for US taxpayers to foot the bill for her childbirth.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
UN Secretary-General names Ghana’s Anita Kiki Gbeho as South Sudan envoy
30 seconds -
Mali withdraws recognition of Sahrawi Republic, backs Morocco’s autonomy plan
5 minutes -
Gov’t distributes over 8,500 laptops to One Million Coders project
6 minutes -
Julius Debrah, ‘man to beat’ as NDC’s James Agbey dismisses Musah Dankwah’s polls
12 minutes -
GPRTU in Savannah Region to protest alleged eviction in Damongo
41 minutes -
Re: Reinsurance does not replace process — A response to the SIGA–SIC defence
56 minutes -
Gender Ministry supports Harriet Amuzu in ongoing abuse case
1 hour -
AG joins plaintiff to scrap OSP ?: We should be mindful of the mischief in this – Bobby Banson
1 hour -
Samson Lardy Anyenini questions willingness of Attorneys-General to prosecute political colleagues
1 hour -
It is only fair the OSP is heard in Supreme Court case – Bobby Banson
1 hour -
Asiedu Nketia resumes Ashanti tour, second leg kicks off on Sunday
2 hours -
NLA denies salary cut claims, threatens legal action over reports
2 hours -
BoG Governor honoured for stabilising cedi, improve inflation
2 hours -
Kyebi Easter Homecoming 2026: A resounding success!
2 hours -
RNAQ divorce ruling: What the noise is hiding
2 hours