
Audio By Carbonatix
Lawyers for the former Chief Executive Officer of the National Petroleum Authority (NPA), Dr. Mustapha Abdul-Hamid, have refuted claims by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) suggesting that assets worth over GH¢100 million linked to their client have been seized.
In a statement issued by Hay & Partners at Law and signed by Hanifa Yahaya Esq., the legal team described the OSP’s claims as “false, misleading, and injurious.”
They stressed that no assets or businesses belonging to or associated with Dr. Abdul-Hamid have been identified, traced, or confiscated by the OSP.
“Our client owns no such assets, directly or indirectly, and no property worth the stated amount exists anywhere in connection with him,” the statement said.
The lawyers further noted that even the OSP’s own amended charge sheet filed on October 17, 2025, which lists five counts of alleged offences, makes no reference to any seized property or businesses linked to Dr. Abdul-Hamid.
They accused the OSP of distorting facts and engaging in “public theatrics and false reportage” rather than focusing on diligent prosecution.
“The OSP, as a public institution established under law, is reminded that its officers are bound by constitutional and ethical obligations to discharge their duties with fairness, integrity, and respect for the rights and dignity of all persons,” the statement read.
“Engaging in public commentary that distorts facts before the court is inconsistent with those obligations and unbecoming of the prosecutorial office.”
The legal team stated that Dr. Abdul-Hamid has cooperated fully with the OSP since the start of the investigation, attending every court sitting and honouring all invitations.
They described his conduct as one of “respect for the judicial process,” insisting that the former NPA boss remains innocent until proven guilty under Ghana’s 1992 Constitution.
“It is deeply regrettable that instead of complying with court orders, the OSP has chosen to engage in media sensationalism,” the statement added.
The lawyers cautioned that any attempt to misinform the public or prejudice opinion against their client undermines the rule of law and the integrity of Ghana’s justice system.
Read the full statement below

Latest Stories
-
We can tackle multiple priorities – Sam George defends Anti-LGBTQ Bill push
12 minutes -
Statement: Ghana Chamber of Mines’ Response to Claims in Joe Jackson’s “Ananse Stories about the Economy of Ghana”
13 minutes -
GES opens 2026 teacher recruitment for licensed B.Ed graduates
15 minutes -
Ghana must value skilled trades, build resilient learners — Ibn Chambas
23 minutes -
Ghana must rethink education around relevance, resilience and responsibility — Ibn Chambas
26 minutes -
Prince Harry faces defamation lawsuit from charity he co-founded
28 minutes -
South Korea deploys thermal cameras to track escaped zoo wolf
30 minutes -
Calls for royal meeting with Epstein survivors grow ahead of US visit
33 minutes -
Ibn Chambas advocates blend of technology and human values in education
35 minutes -
UMA improves healthcare access in Asutifi North with GH₵700k ‘Kim Taylor Legacy’ Walkway
40 minutes -
Scholarships Authority and Fanaka University offer sponsorship for procurement and supply chain studies
43 minutes -
Bisa Kdei drops new single ‘Go N Look’ featuring Medikal
49 minutes -
Benin facing rising terrorism in north as French military presence faces growing criticism
50 minutes -
UEW Public Lecture Series 2026: Education debate ‘about the soul of Ghana’s future’ — Dr Ibn Chambas
51 minutes -
EU fingerprint and photo travel rules come into force from today
1 hour