https://www.myjoyonline.com/no-other-member-of-ppa-board-was-implicated-in-contract-for-sale-scandal-godfred-dame/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/no-other-member-of-ppa-board-was-implicated-in-contract-for-sale-scandal-godfred-dame/

Attorney General-designate Godfred Dame says no board member of the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) was implicated in the Contract for Sale scandal.

Speaking at Parliament's Appointment Committee vetting Friday, he said that the investigations by a committee from the Commission of Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) exonerated every member except for the former CEO Adjenim Boateng Adjei.

“It is important to place on record that it took the board by surprise. Each of the members of the PPA board including my humble self wrote to CHRAJ explain in our involvement, if any, in the matters that the commission had indicated.”

“Mr Chairman, CHRAJ itself came to the conclusion that the PPA board’s contacts did not involve any breach of any law at all and that the only breach in question whereby the Mr A.B Adjei.”

Mr Dame added that Mr Adjei who was caught on camera selling contracts to the highest bidder had agreed that it is not the duty of the board (which he is a member of) to shortlist companies or assess the qualifications of tenders.

"CHRAJ itself indicated that the main issue was whether the CEO had violated his public duty as CEO and board member by participating in such decisions."

Contract for Sale documentary

CEO of the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) Adjenim Boateng Adjei was suspended on August 22, 2019, by President Akufo-Addo, following the broadcast of investigative documentary by Manasseh Azure Awuni, titled “Contracts for Sale”.

In the documentary, the investigator revealed that a company Mr Adjenim Boateng co-owned, had sold government contracts it won through single-source and restrictive tendering to the highest bidder.

In the 'Contracts for Sale' exposé, it claimed among other things that Talent Discovery Limited (TDL), a company incorporated in June 2017 and that has links with the PPA boss, won a number of government contracts through restrictive tendering.

The documentary also alleged that TDL was engaged in the sale of contracts it won.

After suspending him, President Nana Akufo-Addo also directed CHRAJ and the Office of the Special Prosecutor to investigate his appointee for conflict of interest and corruption.

The report from CHRAJ concluded that “on the totality of the evidence, Mr. Adjenim Boateng Adjei had put himself in a position where his personal interests conflicted with the performance of his functions as CEO and Board Member of the PPA.”

It also stated that he abused his high office of trust.

Following findings from the CHRAJ committee tasked to investigate the matter, the PPA boss was dismissed from office.

His dismissal comes with a five year ban, which bars him from holding any public office.

Summary of key findings of CHRAJ investigations

“The following constitute the key findings of the investigation: Talent Discovery Limited (TDL) was incorporated on 19 June 2017, three months after the Respondent was appointed CEO of PPA in March 2017, by the Respondent and his brother-in-law Francis Kwaku Arhin, the Respondent being the majority shareholder.

The Respondent is both a director and shareholder of TDL and Francis Arhin, Respondent’s brother-in-law, is a director, shareholder and CEO of TDL. In effect, the Respondent has personal interest in TDL (financial and relational).

Although the Respondent claimed that he had resigned as director of TDL by reason of letter dated 5th September, 2017 addressed to the CEO and Company Secretary of TDL, all the relevant official records of the company showed that he remained a director of TDL at all material times, and that his purported resignation letter had no probative value whatsoever.

The evidence supports the allegation that TDL participated in a number of restricted tenders, which applications came before the Respondent in his capacity as CEO of PPA and member of the Board of PPA for approval.

TDL was awarded 10 contracts through restricted tender between June 2017 and 22 August 2019. However, the evidence did not support the allegation of award of contracts through sole sourcing.

The Respondent participated in the decision-making process on restricted tender applications that had TDL shortlisted without disclosing his private capacity (financial and relational) interest in the company or recusing himself, except on one occasion, in violation of the Board’s resolution on the matter and Article 284 of the Constitution.

The evidence further showed that the Respondent, on at least two occasions, used his office as CEO of PPA improperly by altering the decision of the Board to the benefit of TDL, a company in which he has personal (financial and relational) interest.

Officials of TDL (Thomas Amoah, Administrative Manager, who is also sometimes described as General Manager, Project Manager or Group Manager, and Abigail, the Office Secretary), the company in which the Respondent is majority shareholder and director, were clearly seen and heard in the documentary offering to sell contracts awarded to TDL by public procurement entities through restricted tender.

The evidence also established a pattern of movement of large volumes of cash through the Respondent’s Bank Accounts between March 2017 and August 2019, far in excess of his known income (Stanbic Bank: USD Account – $516,225.00; Cedi Account – ¢3.83 million; Euro Account – EU54.500; UMB Bank: $110,000). The Respondent could not offer a satisfactory explanation to the source of that huge volume of cash that passed through his bank account between March 2017 and August 2019 (unexplained wealth).

“The totality of the evidence showed that the Respondent had put himself in a position where his personal interest (financial and relational) conflicted with the performance of the functions of his office as CEO and Board Member of PPA.”

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.