'Elaborate handwriting'
In what BBC royal correspondent Jonny Dymond described as a "very robust" response from the Mail on Sunday, the paper argued in a court document that members of the Royal Family, including Meghan, "rely on publicity about themselves and their lives in order to maintain the privileged positions they hold and promote themselves". It said the duchess "did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy that the contents of the letter were private and would remain so". "There is a huge and legitimate public interest in the Royal Family and the activities, conduct and standards of behaviour of its members," it said. "This extends not merely to their public conduct, but to their personal and family relationships because those are integral to the proper functioning of the monarchy." The 44-page legal filing by the Mail on Sunday aims to tackle the duchess' claims one by one:- Meghan claimed she had not courted publicity for her relationship with her father, but the paper says she has not denied authorising her friends to speak about it for an article in a US magazine
- The duchess said publishing the letter breached her copyright, but the Mail on Sunday says it was not a protected "original literary work" but a recounting of existing facts
- Meghan said it infringed her data rights, but the newspaper says the data was not sensitive and concerned topics she had put in the public domain
- Accused of selective editing, the Mail on Sunday says the extracts it released accurately conveyed the tone, content and meaning of the letter
'Relentless propaganda'
In October, law firm Schillings, acting for the duchess, filed a High Court claim against the Mail on Sunday and its parent company Associated Newspapers over the alleged misuse of private information, infringement of copyright and breach of the Data Protection Act 2018. At the time, Harry said he and his wife were forced to take action against "relentless propaganda". Referring to his late mother Diana, Princess of Wales, he said: "I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces." The legal proceedings are being funded privately by the couple and any proceeds will be donated to an anti-bullying charity. It is not the first time the royals have taken legal action against the press. In 2017, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were awarded £92,000 (100,000 euros) in damages after French magazine Closer printed topless pictures of the duchess in 2012.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
Latest Stories
-
#JustTurned18: First-time voters critical to deciding 2024 presidential election
36 mins -
Video: EC lied that the cost per voter in 2020 was $7.7; it was $12.5 – Bright Simons
41 mins -
Former IGP passes on
50 mins -
Ejisu by-election: Kwadaso MP gave money to EC officials out of goodwill – Ahiagbah
1 hour -
Millennium City: Land owner breaks silence on fatal shooting of soldier
1 hour -
Photos of 2024 Aboakyer Festival
2 hours -
#JustTurned18: I now have an opportunity to use my thumb to bring someone into power – Excited prospective voters
2 hours -
OSP acted as a whistleblower transferring Cecilia Dapaah’s case to EOCO – Sammy Darko
2 hours -
IMF calls for tariff adjustment for energy sector cost recovery
3 hours -
Samson’s Take: Journalists, block the pretentious idiots
4 hours -
Real Madrid crowned LaLiga champions after Barcelona’s defeat at Girona
4 hours -
Daniel Otting Awuah elected SRC President of Ghana School of Law
5 hours -
Lawrence Ati-Zigi signs St. Gallen contract extension
5 hours -
We should be careful not to destroy our institutions without just cause – Serebour Quaicoe
6 hours -
Cecilia Dapaah’s case: EOCO hasn’t requested FBI report – Office of the Special Prosecutor
8 hours