On the introduction of the video evidence of NDC’s Press Conferences claiming victory to the 2020 elections by Akoto Ampaw during the cross-examination of star witness Asiedu Nketia for the petitioner, I do not know how that helps the respondents defense irrespective of its admissibility.
That because petitioner’s witness had claimed victory to the election outside the court room, his insistence on the administrative and mathematical blunder committed by the first respondent becomes moot.
You can make any claims outside the Court but when you go to Court you bring a reasonable action which you can prove or satisfy without any doubt.
In the 2012 elections, the NPP also held series of press conferences claiming victory, even when they have lost the Parliamentary elections, but when they went to Court, their case was that the Court should annul results of some polling stations before they can be declared winners.
If they had provided enough basis to the Court, that those votes were illegitimate, their claims outside the Court wouldn’t have mattered.
Their case was thrown out because they were not able to provide any reasonable basis why those results should be annulled.
The crust of the NDC’s case is that the second respondent did not cross the constitutional threshold of 50% plus one to warrant the declaration in his favor.
Whether the petitioner won the elections or not is immaterial to the petitioner’s case. The core question which the Court must answer after this trial is whether the second respondent got the required 50% plus one.
This question cannot be answered by relying on the first respondent’s figures alone which in the short duration of this trial has been abundantly discredited. How the Court decides to arrive at the answer to this question will be at the heart of the fairness of this trial.
Unless my mathematics is bad, I know that there were three possible outcomes in the December 2020 elections; either the second respondent won or the petitioner won or none of them had the required 50% plus one.
Three different outcomes which were all possible after elections and each of them had its own consequences.
This is the petitioner’s case!!!
****
The writer is the Executive Director of the Alliance for Social Equity and Public Accountability (ASEPA), an anti-corruption and civil advocacy group.
Latest Stories
-
Elevating Ghana’s creative industry: A blueprint for competing with Nigeria and South Africa
1 hour -
Poor finishing a problem for Asante Kotoko throughout the season – Prosper Ogum
2 hours -
Samini teams up with Francis Osei for ‘Sticks N Locks’ EP
2 hours -
Government should resource record labels – Seven Xavier
2 hours -
I need majority in parliament to successfully complete my term – Akufo-Addo pleads
2 hours -
Next NDC government will not recognise illegal contracts signed by current administration – Sammy Gyamfi
2 hours -
Premier League clubs vote in favour of spending cap plans
2 hours -
Nigeria’s fuel crisis brings businesses to a halt
3 hours -
King Promise impresses fans at sold out show in Singapore
3 hours -
Ejisu by-election to proceed after plaintiff withdraws injunction application
3 hours -
CSOs and NGOs unite to push for priority demands at INC-4
3 hours -
Fuel tanker bursts into flames on Kumasi-Accra highway
3 hours -
EC’s stolen BVR kits, laptops: One granted bail, three still on remand
3 hours -
2 Things: Sista Afia releases first song off her upcoming album
3 hours -
GHS to embark on COVID-19 vaccination campaign starting May 4
4 hours