The Supreme Court has scheduled May 4, 2022, to offer its verdict on the payment of allowances to the First and Second Ladies of the Republic; that is Rebecca Akufo-Addo and Samira Bawumia.
The Prof Yaa Ntiamoah-Baidu-led Committee last year, recommended emoluments for the Executive, Judiciary and Legislature, as well as a recommendation that the First Lady and the wife of the Vice President should be paid salary.
The Committee had recommended that the First Lady be paid a salary equivalent to a Cabinet Minister who is a Member of Parliament (MP) while her husband is in office and the payment of a salary equivalent to 80% of the salary of a Minister of State who is a Member of Parliament (MP) if the spouse served one full term as President or 100% of the salary of a Minister of State who is a Member of Parliament (MP) if the spouse served two or more full terms as President.
The Committee further suggested that the Second Lady be paid a salary equivalent to a Cabinet Minister who is not an MP while her husband is in office and the payment of a salary equivalent to 80% of the salary of a Minister of State who is not a Member of Parliament (MP) if the spouse served one full term as President or 100% of the salary of a Minister of State who is a Member of Parliament (MP) if the spouse served two or more full terms as Vice President.
The Committee's recommendations sparked public outrage, with some Ghanaians expressing various views on the inclusion of presidential spouses as Article 71 officeholders to be paid as Cabinet Ministers.
Some Members of Parliament also called for an overhaul of the arrangement, saying it was unsustainable.
Legal arguments were filed in the case by private legal practitioner, Nii Kpakpo Samoa Addo, on behalf of his clients Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor (MP for South Dayi), Dr Clement Apaak (Builsa South Mp) and Frederick Nii Commey.
Their lawyer, Nii Kpakpo Samoa Addo, insisted that the First and Second Ladies are not Article 71 Office Holders and, as such, requests that the Supreme Court declare the portions of the Committee's report pertaining to them as unconstitutional, null, void, and of no effect.
In this regard, the First and Second Ladies declined the offer of allowances and went ahead to refund the monies paid them so far to the state.
The First Lady later described some of the reactions as distasteful and sought to portray her as “a venal, self-serving and self-centered woman” who is insensitive to the plight of Ghanaians.
Latest Stories
-
PSG clinch Ligue 1 title after Lyon’s win over Monaco
3 mins -
Guinness Ghana sets the pace at Ghana Beverage Awards with six awards
24 mins -
Burkina Faso suspends BBC, VOA radio broadcasts over killings coverage
29 mins -
Nicole Kidman honoured with AFI Life Achievement Award
41 mins -
Brassier scores winner for Brest as they edge Rennes to secure European football
1 hour -
Ejisu by-election: Akufo-Addo jabs independent candidate; refutes allegations to rig elections
1 hour -
‘What are the real causes of the erratic power outages?’ GUTA demands from ECG
1 hour -
Implementing ESG framework in Ghana’s energy sector for sustainability
2 hours -
CAFCC: Dreams FC exit competition after 3-0 defeat in Kumasi
2 hours -
The detrimental effects of political interference on Ghana’s electricity sustainability
2 hours -
Prof. Opoku-Agyemang’s appointment as running mate intimidates the NPP – Benjamin Quashie
2 hours -
Black Stars physical trainer dead
2 hours -
Bawumia to kick off nationwide campaign for Election 2024 tomorrow
2 hours -
GUTA charges ECG to provide ‘dumsor’ timetable for businesses to plan
2 hours -
Reason for training professional counsellors is to heal a hurting world – CCP president
4 hours