With less than 24 hours to the deadline for enrollment onto the the Debt Exchange Programme, an Economist and Professor of Finance has urged government to further extend the January 16 deadline.
Prof. Godfred Bokpin wants the government to present a more attractive programme than the current one.
According to him, although government intends to restore macroeconomic stability, it should not be done at a “great cost and perhaps irreparable damage to the private sector and households.”
“We can only appeal to the government. It is a programme, we have control over it. As much as possible government could extend the deadline and come with a bit more accommodative proposal in a consensus-building manner that may even be possible and attractive to individual bondholders in a certain way that allows all of us to share the burden,” he said on The Probe, Sunday, January 15.
The Finance Professor said government should do this in the “interest of nation building that we are able to carry everybody along.”
According to him, Ghanaians must also be able to accept some level of debt restructuring to allow government to sustain its debt and restore economic stability.
“I have said before that where we find ourselves there is no way government can meet its future financial obligations as and when they fall due without sharp adjustment in its fiscals, in terms of expenditure and revenue and then the financing mix.
“And therefore a certain level of debt restructuring, we should be able to accept as Ghanaians so that we can come out of this together.”
Already, individual bondholders have vehemently opposed their inclusion in the debt sustainability measure.
Other groups like the Pension Forum are also against the programme. The Majority and Minority in Parliament have also demanded further stakeholder engagement on the programme.
Prof. Bokpin is also unhappy with government's approach to sustaining its debt.
He stressed that government’s approach is “a bit more painful than how much people are going to lose.”
“We are doing something that looks as though we are under military rule, but we are under democracy. Under property-owning democracy, you cannot tear into people’s property and investment the way we are doing.”
He noted that what is necessary for the government to do in this case, is some consensus-building with stakeholders.
Latest Stories
-
Yaw Nsarkoh: Bit by bit we will understand China
6 hours -
Looted and returned: Asante royal artefacts on display for public viewing at Manhyia Museum
6 hours -
Suspected killer in Kasoa land dispute shooting not a National Security operative
7 hours -
Ghana appoint four Para Athletics coaches in Preparation for Paris 2024
7 hours -
Kumasi Cheshire Home decries inadequate equipment; seeks public support
7 hours -
UCL: Niclas Fullkrug hands Dortmund first leg advange over PSG
8 hours -
GPL: Accra Lions beat Hearts of Oak to go third
9 hours -
Seek higher grounds as rains intensify – GMet warns
10 hours -
May Day: Sam Ankrah promises to prioritise welfare and well-being of workers if elected president
10 hours -
Bawumia plans door-to-door campaign for 2024 polls
10 hours -
GAF condemns ‘unprovoked’ fatal shooting of soldier in Kasoa land dispute
10 hours -
OSP’s request for money laundering probe against Cecilia Dapaah baseless – AG advises EOCO
11 hours -
Obofour Raphael releases ‘Asem Yi Di Ka’ EP
11 hours -
‘Operation Clean Your Surroundings’: Popular Kenkey joint and public toilets in Takoradi shut down
11 hours -
GFA boss Kurt Okraku graces Dreams FC’s dinner to celebrate CAF Confederation Cup exploits
11 hours