Audio By Carbonatix
Voting in the district-level elections at the Methodist Church polling station in the Ga-North constituency of the Greater Accra Region recorded an interesting incident when an identical twin was refused voting because the biometric system had identified her as someone who had already voted.
Her twin sister had successfully voted after going through the identification process.
She turned up hours later after her sister had voted, hoping to exercise her franchise, however, she was identified as having already voted, and was therefore not allowed to vote.
The Presiding Officer at the centre explained that this was the first of its kind, adding that it might either be the same person posing as her other twin or a minor system failure.
However, residents say they know the twin sisters; therefore they were surprised the system identified them as the same person.
A man hinted that if the indelible ink was in place, this could have been avoided.
He questioned whether the same situation would arise if there were about 100 twins.
He appealed to the Electoral Commission to find a way of resolving this minor challenge because the twin who was denied her franchise only went home without complaining because it was a district-level election.
The Electoral Commission has announced that in this election and subsequent polls, there would be no need for indelible ink.
Indelible Ink is a semi-permanent dye applied to voters' fingerprints to indicate who has exercised their franchise and prevents double voting.
Speaking at a press conference ahead of the December 19 district-level election, the EC chair, Jean Mensa, said this was part of measures by the Commission to improve the electoral process and ensure a robust identification system.
“The issue of indelible ink, the question is when we were not doing biometric we were basically using your face, your card. We look at your face and we say this picture looks like you.
“The biometric technology makes it difficult for a person who has been verified and cast their vote to come a second time. So, there is no need for indelible ink. Once you have been verified, it goes into the system and you cannot come back a second time,” she said.
Latest Stories
-
Drobonso plants for the future as EPA sounds climate change alarm
4 minutes -
Society must consider real-life family implications of LGBTQ+ laws – Senyo Hosi
5 minutes -
Ghana questions South Africa’s commitment to tackling xenophobia – Okudzeto Ablakwa
12 minutes -
UHAS hosts inaugural lecture for Prof Yaw Asante Awuku
14 minutes -
VPNs, Social media and data risks: why experts say Ghana’s porn age verification won’t work
15 minutes -
Anti-LGBTQ+ bill could be used to oppress rather than protect values – Kofi Bentil
22 minutes -
Okudzeto Ablakwa renews calls for borderless Africa to tackle xenophobia
30 minutes -
Ablakwa condemns xenophobic attacks in South Africa, calls for stronger African unity
38 minutes -
Ablakwa condemns xenophobic attacks, says Ghana welcomed over 11,000 South African tourists in 2025
40 minutes -
The BoG Debate: Using the wrong marking scheme for the right answers
46 minutes -
Rev. Ntim Fordjour says 31 amendments to Ghana’s anti-LGBTQ+ bill weaken enforcement
51 minutes -
Porn ID proposal may be an attempt to divert attention from anti-LGBTQ+ bill demands — Ntim Fordjour
2 hours -
Protection of children must remain central to porn verification debate — Bernard Baidoo
2 hours -
Kofi Bentil opposes proposed porn ID verification, warns against ‘morality police’
2 hours -
Livestream: Newsfile discusses Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, porn ID law, June floods and court case on security chiefs
2 hours