Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for an injunction against approving President Akufo-Addo’s new ministerial appointees.
The application, filed by South Dayi legislator Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, was deemed frivolous and an abuse of court processes by the apex court.
There were interesting twists today as the Supreme Court presided over the application filed by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament, as the fate of newly nominated ministers and reshuffled ministers appointed by President Akufo-Addo hung in the balance.

This was the application based on which the Speaker of Parliament decided to hold off on okaying the new appointees after their vetting.
In his lawsuit against the Speaker of Parliament (1st defendant) and the Attorney General (2nd defendant), Dafeamekpor argued that the President should have sought parliamentary approval before reassigning ministers whose appointments were revoked.
President Akufo-Addo's reshuffle on February 14, 2024, saw 13 ministers and 10 deputy ministers relieved of their posts, while 6 were reassigned to various portfolios.
- Read more: Parliament suspends approval of Akufo-Addo’s new ministers, deputies amid row over anti-gay bill
There was drama in court today as the applicant Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor and his lawyers were absent.
At a point, the case was stood down for the court to verify some facts of the case, particularly regarding whether the bailiff served the parties, especially the Plaintiff, Mr Dafeamekpor, with a hearing notice.
The Attorney General criticised the conduct of the MP's lawyer, describing it as the highest form of disrespect to the apex court and as professional misconduct.
Despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor and his lawyer, the court proceeded with the case, which took an interesting turn as the lawyer for the NDC legislator refused to accept court documents to be served on him, including a hearing notice.
The lawyers for the Speaker of Parliament opposed the injunction application, arguing that it did not satisfy the requirements for an injunction to be granted.
Ultimately, the case was thrown out by the Supreme Court.
The five judges presiding over the case were Justice Kingsley Koomson, Justice Mariama Owusu, Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo (Presiding), Justice Amadu Tanko, and Justice Yaw Darko Asare.
In the end, despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor's lawyers, the Supreme Court ruled against the injunction application.
Latest Stories
-
2026 World Cup: Can Ghana navigate England, Croatia, and Panama in Group L?
7 minutes -
NAIMOS task force arrests 9 Chinese illegal miners, destroys equipment at Dadieso
34 minutes -
NAIMOS advances into Atiwa Forest, uncovers child labour, river diversion and heavy machinery
45 minutes -
NAIMOS Task Force storms Fanteakwa South, dismantles galamsey operations
1 hour -
The Kissi Agyebeng Removal Bid: A Look at the Numbers
2 hours -
DVLA to roll out digitised accident reports, new number plates and 24-hour services
2 hours -
DVLA Workers’ Union opens 2025 Annual Residential Delegates Congress with call for excellence, equity and solidarity
3 hours -
Scholarships Secretariat sets December 8–9 interviews for Commonwealth Scholarship applicants
3 hours -
WASSCE decline reveals deep gaps, there’s need to overhaul education system – Franklin Cudjoe
4 hours -
JOY FM Drive Time host Lexis Bill leads fans up Aburi Mountain in energetic ‘Walk With Lexis’ fitness experience
4 hours -
2026 World Cup: Ghana to open campaign in Toronto against Panama
4 hours -
President Mahama, Lordina support retired Assemblies of God pastors, widows with medical care and Christmas gifts
4 hours -
2025/26 GPL: Nations FC fight back to claim 2-1 win over Heart of Lions
4 hours -
Tanzania responds to international criticism over October post-election events
4 hours -
Burkina Faso plans to restore death penalty for treason, terrorism, espionage
4 hours
