Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for an injunction against approving President Akufo-Addo’s new ministerial appointees.
The application, filed by South Dayi legislator Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, was deemed frivolous and an abuse of court processes by the apex court.
There were interesting twists today as the Supreme Court presided over the application filed by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament, as the fate of newly nominated ministers and reshuffled ministers appointed by President Akufo-Addo hung in the balance.

This was the application based on which the Speaker of Parliament decided to hold off on okaying the new appointees after their vetting.
In his lawsuit against the Speaker of Parliament (1st defendant) and the Attorney General (2nd defendant), Dafeamekpor argued that the President should have sought parliamentary approval before reassigning ministers whose appointments were revoked.
President Akufo-Addo's reshuffle on February 14, 2024, saw 13 ministers and 10 deputy ministers relieved of their posts, while 6 were reassigned to various portfolios.
- Read more: Parliament suspends approval of Akufo-Addo’s new ministers, deputies amid row over anti-gay bill
There was drama in court today as the applicant Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor and his lawyers were absent.
At a point, the case was stood down for the court to verify some facts of the case, particularly regarding whether the bailiff served the parties, especially the Plaintiff, Mr Dafeamekpor, with a hearing notice.
The Attorney General criticised the conduct of the MP's lawyer, describing it as the highest form of disrespect to the apex court and as professional misconduct.
Despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor and his lawyer, the court proceeded with the case, which took an interesting turn as the lawyer for the NDC legislator refused to accept court documents to be served on him, including a hearing notice.
The lawyers for the Speaker of Parliament opposed the injunction application, arguing that it did not satisfy the requirements for an injunction to be granted.
Ultimately, the case was thrown out by the Supreme Court.
The five judges presiding over the case were Justice Kingsley Koomson, Justice Mariama Owusu, Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo (Presiding), Justice Amadu Tanko, and Justice Yaw Darko Asare.
In the end, despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor's lawyers, the Supreme Court ruled against the injunction application.
Latest Stories
-
GSE showed strong performance in August 2026 despite recording more stock losses
2 hours -
If CJ needs ethics law to know SOE comments were wrong, he may not be worthy of office – Arthur Kennedy
3 hours -
Stop touring state agencies and focus on the Judiciary’s problems – Arthur Kennedy to CJ
3 hours -
Apologise and don’t do it again – Arthur Kennedy to Chief Justice over SOE comments
3 hours -
Chief Justice remains committed to judicial independence, justice and equality – Judicial Service
3 hours -
Ghana concludes evacuation of citizens from South Africa; total returnees reach 1,900 – Ablakwa
4 hours -
Africa must define its own green transition path – Prof Fatima Denton
4 hours -
WASSCE 2026: English Language performance falls to 62.4% – WAEC
4 hours -
WASSCE 2026: Social Studies records sharp rebound as Maths, Science also improve
5 hours -
2026 WASSCE entry rises by 11% as 512,862 candidates sit exams
5 hours -
WASSCE 2026: English Language performance falls to 62.4% – WAEC
5 hours -
WAEC cancels 2026 WASSCE results of 8,295 candidates over examination irregularities
5 hours -
WAEC releases provisional 2026 WASSCE results for 512,862 candidates
6 hours -
CJ’s remarks on SOEs were made in good faith, not to undermine judicial independence – Judicial Service
9 hours -
Bright Future Alliance pays courtesy call on Akufo-Addo, invites him to African Leaders of Influence Lectureship Series
9 hours