Audio By Carbonatix
Member of Parliament for Suame Constituency has questioned the authority of the Speaker of Parliament to unilaterally set up a committee to investigate the chaos that erupted during the sitting of the Appointments Committee.
According to John Darko, such a move is not grounded in the Constitution or Parliament’s Standing Orders.
In an interview on Joy FM's Top Story on Monday, February 3, Mr. Darko argued that the Speaker overstepped his authority by reconstituting the Appointments Committee and now setting up another committee without due parliamentary procedure.
He pointed out that when the Speaker initially reconstituted the Appointments Committee, members of the majority did not recognise his authority and proceeded to vet the minister regardless.
Read also: Committee probing parliamentary chaos to start public hearings from Feb. 5
"The Speaker is not the House. Our Standing Orders clearly state in Order 362 that it is the House, through a motion, that may appoint a special or ad hoc committee to investigate matters of public importance. The Speaker cannot unilaterally establish a committee. There has been no motion in the House regarding this, so this decision is not valid," Mr. Darko asserted.
This comes after the Speaker of Parliament has set up an ad-hoc committee to investigate the chaos that occurred during the Appointments Committee's sitting on Thursday, 30th January.
The committee is expected to start a public hearing on February 5.
The disruption arose from a disagreement between the minority and majority over the further vetting of ministerial nominees, which escalated into a physical altercation, damaging tables and microphones.
The Speaker has since suspended four MPs believed to have incited the disturbances: three from the minority and one from the majority.
According to Mr Darko, the Speaker by setting up this committee is arrogating to himself powers he doesn't have.
The lawmaker further criticised the Speaker’s directive that no member appointed to the committee could refuse participation.
"What kind of Republic are we building? Members are being forced to serve on a committee without their consent. This is not how a democratic system operates," he added.
Mr. Darko warned that such actions could set a dangerous precedent and undermine the principles of governance in the country.
He reaffirmed that members of the Majority Caucus would not participate in the Speaker’s committee, stating, "Our members will not be part of it."
Latest Stories
-
Education Minister inaugurates NDU Governing Council, announces $25m seed funding
6 minutes -
THE LAW 101: La Beach Demolitions – The State’s own documents, the courts’ orders – and the bulldozers
9 minutes -
DVLA contributes GH¢17.7m to Consolidated Fund in 2025
12 minutes -
Why disaster risk reduction must connect early warnings, preparedness and financial protection to household-level resilience
19 minutes -
The AI Gold Rush: Who strikes gold and who gets left behind?
43 minutes -
Pius Hadzide rejects blame for journalists’ visas in 2018 Australia scandal
1 hour -
What Is Wrong With Us: We queue for the Colosseum while our own Castles crumble
1 hour -
Dangote IPO fever could deepen Africa’s capital markets, Citi Bank executive says
2 hours -
US hopes diesel deal can ‘soften’ Moscow on peace talks, sources say
2 hours -
Oil falls as Russia diesel supply prospects counter Gulf supply risks
2 hours -
Moroccan centrist party agrees to form coalition government with three other parties
2 hours -
IMF cites AI slowdown, spiking yields as looming global market risks
2 hours -
Nvidia’s China AI-chip share falls as Huawei closes gap, report finds
2 hours -
Trump says he does not believe China and Russia are helping Iran ‘at all’
3 hours -
One dead and several hurt after rollercoaster incident at Six Flags
4 hours