Audio By Carbonatix
Four senior judges in Kenya have been declared unfit for office in a landmark ruling by a new committee investigating the impartiality of the judiciary.
The vetting panel was set up as part of the deal to end post-election violence in 2008 when it was agreed to reform political and judicial institutions.
Those dismissed include Justice Riaga Omollo, the appeal court's president.
Five other judges were cleared. The four told they are unfit to continue have seven days to appeal.
'Restore public confidence'
The BBC's Nairobi bureau editor David Okwembah says the dismissals have come as a shock.
There have been other attempts to clean up the judiciary in the past, but they have been regarded as being politically motivated, he says.
"The main objective of the board is not to punish but to restore public confidence in the judiciary," the panel's chairman Sharad Rao is quoted as saying by Kenya's The Standard newspaper.
The other judges dismissed were Samuel Bosire, Emmanuel Okubasu and Joseph Nyamu.
Judge Omollo was accused of being authoritarian and failing to show impartiality under former President Daniel arap Moi, who ruled Kenya from 1978 until 2002.
Justice Bosire was accused of condoning the torture in 1982 of suspects accused of attempting a coup.
None of the judges has so far commented.
More than 1,200 people were killed in weeks of political unrest following the December 2007 elections and some 600,000 people were forced to flee their homes.
President Mwai Kibaki was eventually declared the winner of the poll, and his rival Raila Odinga was installed as prime minister under a power-sharing deal brokered by former UN chief Kofi Annan.
Four prominent Kenyans are being tried by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for their part in organising the violence. They all deny the accusations.
The power-sharing agreement had initially said that those accused of being the main perpetrators would stand trial in Kenya, but politicians were unable to agree on setting up a local tribunal; who to prosecute and how to proceed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Chile elects far-right José Antonio Kast as next president
21 minutes -
Beyond Farmers’ Day, let’s continue to ‘Eat Ghana’ to secure the future
31 minutes -
Russia poses acute threat, new MI6 chief to warn
2 hours -
Their diamond-rich land in South Africa was taken. Now they want it back
2 hours -
‘Person of interest’ detained over Brown University shooting, police say
2 hours -
Revered Nigeria traditional ruler, Ooni of Ife to confer prestigious Yoruba title on Mahama
4 hours -
Kane scores as Bayern Munich draw against bottom side Mainz
5 hours -
Sunderland recreate Newcastle team photo after ‘special’ derby win
5 hours -
2026 FIFA World Cup: What African fans will pay to watch their teams
5 hours -
Minamino strikes as Monaco beat leaders Paris St-Germain
5 hours -
Real Madrid ease pressure on Alonso with win at Alaves
5 hours -
US TikTok investors in limbo as deal set to be delayed again
5 hours -
‘Not good enough’ – Amorim admits he and Man Utd are ‘underachieving’
6 hours -
2026 World Cup: How FIFA priced Africa’s ordinary fan out of the tournament – and why the gap with the rest of the world is impossible to ignore
6 hours -
Creative industries ‘incredibly worried’ about OpenAI-Disney deal
6 hours
