The flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), John Dramani Mahama, has voiced his opinion that the current parliamentary impasse could have been resolved through alternative measures rather than court intervention.
Addressing the clergy in Kumasi on Monday, 11 November, Mahama highlighted the value of dialogue and negotiation in managing political disagreements, stressing that collaboration would have been a more productive approach.
Mahama’s remarks come amid a heated legal battle over the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin’s, declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant.
This decision, which has ignited significant political discourse, was initially made by Speaker Bagbin based on claims that the affected MPs had breached constitutional requirements.
Following this ruling, the Supreme Court stepped in, suspending the Speaker’s directive pending a final decision.
The court’s verdict on this matter is expected on Tuesday, 12 November 2024, an announcement that will be closely monitored by both political actors and the general public.
In his address, Mahama suggested that a court ruling should not have been necessary if open dialogue had been pursued, proposing that mediation could have prevented the issue from escalating to this level.
The former President underlined that political disputes are best settled through communication, as it fosters unity and avoids the divisive consequences of legal confrontations.
Mahama added that resorting to judicial means could set an unhealthy precedent for future parliamentary disagreements.
In his view, resolving matters internally demonstrates a commitment to collaboration and a dedication to strengthening Ghana’s democratic fabric.
By advocating for dialogue, Mahama is urging the government and other political stakeholders to prioritise amicable solutions, reinforcing his belief that Ghana’s democratic progress relies on cooperation over conflict.
“I think that it is something we can solve politically. The solution is not legal because the Supreme Court can make a decision and Parliament would say we are not under you, we are a separate arm of government. So, this would have demanded a political solution. But all that is dependent on the president."
“If I were a president, I would have taken the case out of the Supreme Court and called both sides and their leaders and Council of State and the speaker to resolve the matter because I believe if that is done there would be a resolution to the matter,” he asserted.
Latest Stories
-
Trump sets new deadline of 10 or 12 days for Russia to act on Ukraine
8 minutes -
US airlines oppose new limits on facial recognition at airport checkpoints
18 minutes -
US to allow federal workers to promote religion in workplaces
33 minutes -
Rare 4,000-year-old Egyptian handprint found
45 minutes -
Five killed in Bangkok market mass shooting
57 minutes -
Lionesses welcomed home by jubilant fans after Euro 2025 win
1 hour -
Newcastle open talks to sign Southampton’s Ramsdale
1 hour -
Everton bid for Aznou but need six more players – Moyes
2 hours -
Bishop Dr. Ezekiel Goodman Kofi Anim
3 hours -
Nana Ama McBrown undergoes fifth surgery, appeals for prayers as she recovers
5 hours -
Highlife Legend Daddy Lumba’s posthumous reign deepens on Apple Music Ghana
5 hours -
GES orders school heads to refund WASSCE practical fees to students
6 hours -
Asantehene hands over land for construction of Ghana School of Law campus in Kumasi
6 hours -
Over 200 substandard hospitality facilities in the Ashanti region face closure by GTA
6 hours -
Sinapi Aba’s Joyce Owusu-Dabo honoured Personality of the Decade by African Women in Banking and Finance Magazine
7 hours