A member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC)’ legal team, has defended the party’s General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketia’s saying ‘I am not the petitioner’ when he took the witness box in the ongoing election petition hearing on Friday.
Dr Dominic Anyine's defence comes after, a member of President Akufo-Addo’s legal team, Frank Davies said Mr Nketia’s attitude in the witness stand was “largely evasive” by answering every question posed, with, “I do not speak for the petitioner.”
But speaking on Joy FM’s NewsFile Saturday, Dr Anyine said the witness’ statement has been misconstrued.
According to him, the legal counsel of the 1st and 2nd respondents were constantly asking questions that were meant for the petitioner, John Mahama and not the witness.
As such, Mr Asiedu Nketia saying, ‘I am not the petitioner,’ doesn’t mean he will not be able to speak to the petition.
“…Look at the nature of questions posed to him, in respect of which he said, ‘I am not the petitioner’...those were matters that required an enquiry to the personal knowledge of the petitioner.
“In respect of that, Asiedu Nketia is not John Dramani Mahama so he won’t be able to say whether or not at the point in time the declaration was done, John Mahama knew or reasonably ought to have known that he has lost the election. So it was the question posed that elicited the response,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court after hearing the election petition sent to it by 2020 NDC flagbearer, John Mahama, has struck out portions of the statement submitted to it by the General Secretary of the party.
Akoto Ampaw, the lead counsel for the second respondent, President Akufo-Addo, has argued that 10 paragraphs in Johnson Asiedu Nketia’s statement should be deleted as they are “not based on the pleadings of the petitioner, unduly prejudicial and scandalous”.
But, Tsatsu Tsikata, the lead counsel for the petitioner, opposed this saying it was preposterous and demanded the Court allow all the paragraphs to stay as they are “material” to their petition.
This did not convince the Supreme Court Justices, who overruled seven out of 10 paragraphs.
Latest Stories
-
King Charles to resume public duties after progress in cancer treatment
17 mins -
Arda Guler scores on first start in La Liga as Madrid beat Real Sociedad
27 mins -
Fatawu Issahaku’s Leicester City secures Premier League promotion after Leeds defeat
40 mins -
Anticipation builds as Junior Speller hosts nationwide auditions
1 hour -
Etse Sikanku: The driver’s mate conundrum
2 hours -
IMF Deputy Chief worried large chunk of Eurobonds is used to service debt
2 hours -
Otumfuo Osei Tutu II celebrates 25 years of peaceful rule on golden stool
2 hours -
We have enough funds to pay accruing benefits; we’ve never missed pension payments since 1991 – SSNIT
2 hours -
Let’s embrace shared vision and propel National Banking College – First Deputy Governor
3 hours -
Liverpool agree compensation deal with Feyenoord for Slot
3 hours -
Ejisu by-election: There’s no evidence of NPP engaging in vote-buying – Ahiagbah
3 hours -
Ejisu by-election: Independent ex-NPP MP’s campaign team warns party against dubious tactics
4 hours -
ZEN Petroleum supports Tse-Addo Future Leaders School
4 hours -
NPP must win back Adentan seat in 2024 polls – Obeng Fosu
5 hours -
PPA Clarification: The dark side of the World Bank’s ‘giveaways’ in Ghana by Bright Simons
6 hours