Audio By Carbonatix
The World Health Organisation (WHO) is set to declare an artificial sweetener as a possible cause of cancer.
Aspartame is used in popular products like Coca-Cola’s diet drinks and Mars Extra chewing gum.
But next month, the WHO is set to list it as ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’, according to two sources with knowledge of the process.
The ruling won’t take into account how much aspartame someone can consume safely – that advice comes separately from a WHO expert committee on food additives.
The organisation’s committee on additives is reviewing aspartame use this year, and will announce its findings on July 14, the same day the decision on whether to declare it as carcinogenic is published.
A spokesman for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the WHO’s dedicated cancer research arm which has been looking into the sweetener, said its findings were ‘confidential’ until July.
The additives committee ‘conducts risk assessment, which determines the probability of a specific type of harm to occur under certain conditions and levels of exposure’.
Since 1981,the additives committee has said aspartame is safe to consume within daily limits.


For example, an adult weighing 60 kg (132 pounds) would have to drink between 12 and 36 cans of diet soda – depending on the amount of aspartame in the beverage – every day to be at risk.
This view has been widely shared by national regulators, including in the United States and Europe.
The IARC’s rulings can have a huge impact – but have also sparked criticism over warnings about hard-to-avoid substances and situations.
It previously classed working overnight and eating red meat as ‘probably cancer-causing’, and using mobile phones as ‘possibly cancer-causing’.
The International Sweeteners Association has criticised the IARC’s decision-making, saying: ‘IARC is not a food safety body and their review of aspartame is not scientifically comprehensive and is based heavily on widely discredited research.’
The International Council of Beverages Associations’ executive director Kate Loatman said public health authorities should be ‘deeply concerned’ by the ‘leaked opinion’, and also warned it ‘could needlessly mislead consumers into consuming more sugar rather than choosing safe no- and low-sugar options’.
Sources close to the IARC say classing aspartame as a possible carcinogen should motivate more research into the sweetener.
Last month the WHO advised people not to use non-sugar sweeteners while attempting to lose weight, causing uproar in the food industry.
Latest Stories
-
Students who engage in inter-hall fights will be sacked – UCC Acting Vice Chancellor warns
19 minutes -
Disco Dance hit maker Ebo Taylor dances into eternity
24 minutes -
We are working to pay cocoa farmers’ arrears, exploring new funding model – COCOBOD
29 minutes -
Analysis: How the proposed sliding-scale royalties could impact mining revenue
33 minutes -
Renaming Kotoka International Airport: Counting benefits versus costs
48 minutes -
Husband reported wife missing, then her body was found in wedding dress bag
1 hour -
Man named in South Africa’s police corruption probe found dead
1 hour -
Dembele scores twice as PSG hit 5 past Marseille
1 hour -
Real Madrid beat Valencia to close gap to leaders Barca
2 hours -
Real Madrid wants to sign Barcelona’s Pedri: Report
2 hours -
Spanish train drivers to begin nationwide strike after fatal crashes
2 hours -
Netherlands returns 3,500-year-old looted sculpture to Egypt
2 hours -
‘Trump’s psyche’: The aide driving president’s most controversial policies
2 hours -
Algeria begins to cancel air services agreement with UAE
2 hours -
Gunmen kill three people and abduct Catholic priest in northern Nigeria
3 hours
