The World Health Organisation (WHO) is set to declare an artificial sweetener as a possible cause of cancer.
Aspartame is used in popular products like Coca-Cola’s diet drinks and Mars Extra chewing gum.
But next month, the WHO is set to list it as ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’, according to two sources with knowledge of the process.
The ruling won’t take into account how much aspartame someone can consume safely – that advice comes separately from a WHO expert committee on food additives.
The organisation’s committee on additives is reviewing aspartame use this year, and will announce its findings on July 14, the same day the decision on whether to declare it as carcinogenic is published.
A spokesman for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the WHO’s dedicated cancer research arm which has been looking into the sweetener, said its findings were ‘confidential’ until July.
The additives committee ‘conducts risk assessment, which determines the probability of a specific type of harm to occur under certain conditions and levels of exposure’.
Since 1981,the additives committee has said aspartame is safe to consume within daily limits.


For example, an adult weighing 60 kg (132 pounds) would have to drink between 12 and 36 cans of diet soda – depending on the amount of aspartame in the beverage – every day to be at risk.
This view has been widely shared by national regulators, including in the United States and Europe.
The IARC’s rulings can have a huge impact – but have also sparked criticism over warnings about hard-to-avoid substances and situations.
It previously classed working overnight and eating red meat as ‘probably cancer-causing’, and using mobile phones as ‘possibly cancer-causing’.
The International Sweeteners Association has criticised the IARC’s decision-making, saying: ‘IARC is not a food safety body and their review of aspartame is not scientifically comprehensive and is based heavily on widely discredited research.’
The International Council of Beverages Associations’ executive director Kate Loatman said public health authorities should be ‘deeply concerned’ by the ‘leaked opinion’, and also warned it ‘could needlessly mislead consumers into consuming more sugar rather than choosing safe no- and low-sugar options’.
Sources close to the IARC say classing aspartame as a possible carcinogen should motivate more research into the sweetener.
Last month the WHO advised people not to use non-sugar sweeteners while attempting to lose weight, causing uproar in the food industry.
Latest Stories
-
Attack on media completely shameful – Miracles Aboagye
5 minutes -
JOB ADVERTISEMENT: Administrative Officer, Receptionist at Onesta Ghana Limited
9 minutes -
Gov’t condemns assault on journalists at Ablekuma North election re-run
17 minutes -
World Bank ranks Ghana low at 29th position with debt policy and management score
20 minutes -
24-Hour Economy risks “repackaged dependency” without stronger agricultural and industrial foundations – IMANI
32 minutes -
New GJA-Volta Executives sworn into office
33 minutes -
Take action against Ablekuma North attackers – Bawumia to Mahama
33 minutes -
ISSER Report warns of falling Basic Education enrollment, stalled healthcare access
35 minutes -
GUSA contingent to represent Ghana at FISU Games in Germany
57 minutes -
Dr. Bawumia condemns Ablekuma North violence, urges presidential action
59 minutes -
Ablekuma North attacks disturbing, this is not the democracy we want to see – Bawumia
1 hour -
Sudan’s ‘Report a Collaborator’ campaign raises alarms over ethnic abuses and Sham trials
1 hour -
I don’t trust the NDC, so we’re staying vigilant – Sammi Awuku
1 hour -
Enhancing EDSA’s energy accountability and revenue protection for a sustainable power sector
1 hour -
The role of pregnancy schools in reducing maternal mortality in Ghana
2 hours