Audio By Carbonatix
India's Supreme Court has asked the government to review the suspension of internet services in Indian-administered Kashmir within a week.
The region has not had access to internet for more than 150 days, the longest such shutdown in India.
The government suspended internet, mobile phone and landline services in Kashmir before stripping it of partial autonomy on 5 August.
The court was responding to a clutch of petitions challenging the restrictions.
"Complete curb of internet must be considered by the state only as an extraordinary measure," said Justice NV Ramana, reading out the judgement on Friday, adding that access to the internet was part of the right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by the constitution.
The three-judge bench also ruled that the indefinite suspension of internet services is "impermissible" and such restrictions can "be temporary only".
Some mobile phone and landline services were restored in October, but the indefinite internet suspension has crippled daily life, the media and businesses.
The move by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government to revoke the region's autonomy was controversial as it underpinned Kashmir's fraught relationship with Delhi. India has also been fighting a long-running insurgency in the Muslim-majority valley.
The second-longest internet shutdown in India was also in Kashmir - it lasted from 8 July to 19 November in 2016. But the blackout this time -which also initially included phone services - has severely hurt the region's economy. A range of businesses, from IT services to trade are struggling to operate.
The indefinite internet suspension has crippled daily life, the media and businesses
A colonial-era law, known as section 144, which prohibits a gathering of more than four people to prevent violence or any disruption of law and order, has also been imposed in the region.
But the court ruled that the law cannot be used "as a curb on legitimate expression of democratic rights." It ordered the government to review all orders imposing such restrictions within seven days.
While the government has maintained that the region has been largely calm, it has also said the restrictions have been in place to prevent violence.
Media caption"Beaten and tortured" by the Indian army
In October, parliament also formally divided the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two new federally-administered territories, which are now ruled directly from the capital Delhi. Union territories have far less autonomy from the federal government than states do.
It's widely believed that this was done to tighten the Indian government's control over the part of Kashmir it administers.
The indefinite internet suspension has crippled daily life, the media and businesses
A colonial-era law, known as section 144, which prohibits a gathering of more than four people to prevent violence or any disruption of law and order, has also been imposed in the region.
But the court ruled that the law cannot be used "as a curb on legitimate expression of democratic rights." It ordered the government to review all orders imposing such restrictions within seven days.
While the government has maintained that the region has been largely calm, it has also said the restrictions have been in place to prevent violence.
Media caption"Beaten and tortured" by the Indian army
In October, parliament also formally divided the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two new federally-administered territories, which are now ruled directly from the capital Delhi. Union territories have far less autonomy from the federal government than states do.
It's widely believed that this was done to tighten the Indian government's control over the part of Kashmir it administers.
India's longest shutdowns:
- 159 days and counting: Internet services were suspended on 4 August in Jammu and Kashmir this year
- 133 days: An internet shutdown in Indian-administered Kashmir which lasted from 8 July to 19 November in 2016
- 99 days: Authorities shut off the internet in India's West Bengal state from 18 June to 25 September in 2017
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Julius Debrah, ‘man to beat’ as NDC’s James Agbey dismisses Musah Dankwah’s polls
4 minutes -
GPRTU in Savannah Region to protest alleged eviction in Damongo
33 minutes -
Re: Reinsurance does not replace process — A response to the SIGA–SIC defence
48 minutes -
Gender Ministry supports Harriet Amuzu in ongoing abuse case
1 hour -
AG joins plaintiff to scrap OSP ?: We should be mindful of the mischief in this – Bobby Banson
1 hour -
Samson Lardy Anyenini questions willingness of Attorneys-General to prosecute political colleagues
1 hour -
It is only fair the OSP is heard in Supreme Court case – Bobby Banson
1 hour -
Asiedu Nketia resumes Ashanti tour, second leg kicks off on Sunday
1 hour -
NLA denies salary cut claims, threatens legal action over reports
1 hour -
BoG Governor honoured for stabilising cedi, improve inflation
1 hour -
Kyebi Easter Homecoming 2026: A resounding success!
2 hours -
RNAQ divorce ruling: What the noise is hiding
2 hours -
Trade Minister applauds GUTA as a pillar of economic growth; Prez Mahama honoured
3 hours -
President’s brother’s takeover of Damang Mines is ‘untidy’ – Alhassan Tampuli
3 hours -
It’s not true that gov’t decided not to renew the lease for Gold Fields – Bobby Banson
3 hours