Audio By Carbonatix
The Duke of Sussex faced "significant tensions" with a top aide to the Queen involved in downgrading his security, a court has been told.
Challenging the decision, Prince Harry's lawyer said he had not been aware Sir Edward Young, the Queen's private secretary, played a role.
The decision was "materially prejudiced" as key information was withheld, Shaeed Fatima QC said.
The duke lost full protection after he stepped back from royal duties in 2020.
Without a guarantee of police protection, Prince Harry believes it is too dangerous to bring his family from the US to visit the UK - which his lawyer has previously said "is and always will be his home".
The duke's legal team argued the decision about his security by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as Ravec, was invalid because of "procedural unfairness".
They questioned whether it was "appropriate" for Sir Edward or other members of the Royal Household to sit on the committee, when Prince Harry had been told it was "independent".
Representing the duke, Ms Fatima said: "He didn't know at that stage that the Royal Household was involved at all."

She said Prince Harry should have been able to make direct representations to Ravec to ensure his arguments were properly communicated to the committee and been given an opportunity to respond to points being made by others, including members of the Royal Household.
Ms Fatima said his offer to pay for his own police protection "was not conveyed to Ravec" and so the decision was "materially prejudiced".
Lawyers for the Home Office say Ravec was entitled to make the decision it did - to provide police protection to Prince Harry and Meghan on a case-by-case basis when they visit the UK.
Sir James Eadie QC, representing the Home Office, said in written arguments that personal tensions between Prince Harry and Royal Household officials are "irrelevant" to his change in status when he stepped back from royal duties.
He said there was "no basis" to conclude that the duke making representations to the committee would have led to a different outcome.
Prince Harry has previously argued his private security team cannot replicate the work of police protection in the UK, with their access to local intelligence and legal powers.
He and Meghan have only rarely visited since their move to California. On one visit in July 2021, the duke's car was chased by photographers as he left a charity event.
The Sussexes also stopped in the UK in April, meeting the Queen on the way to the Invictus Games, and attended the thanksgiving service during the Platinum Jubilee last month.
Latest Stories
-
Lebanon parliament votes to abolish death penalty
10 minutes -
The rise of AI in the classroom: Balancing technological innovation with critical thinking
38 minutes -
Five arrested over alleged MoMo robbery syndicate in Upper West
43 minutes -
UEW journalism students call for practical media studio
46 minutes -
Beyond certification: How Bawaa the artist is helping young creatives turn talent into opportunity
54 minutes -
The Law 101: Vacation warrants and the role of the CJ (Part IV)
1 hour -
The Law 101: GBA states pure law and convention about Legal Vacation (Part III)
1 hour -
Pray – THE LAW 101: The Vacation Roster dilemma and the reality of Court Recess (Part II)
2 hours -
Trump hid in catering truck in secret plane swap over Iran threat, reports say
2 hours -
Inside the Secret Service ‘shell game’ to hide US presidents in plain sight
2 hours -
GEA seeks Gender Ministry’s support for Female Future Programme
2 hours -
Driver beaten to death over misunderstanding at Gomoa Achiase
2 hours -
Bagre Dam spillage: 68 communities in Northern region alerted as Burkina Faso monitors water levels
2 hours -
ECG announces power outages in Central, Eastern and Western Regions on Thursday
2 hours -
THE LAW 101: Tempus Non Currit – Why the sacred silence of the Legal Vacation protects justice (Part I)
3 hours