Audio By Carbonatix
The Public Procurement Authority (PPA) has rejected the Parliamentary Service of Ghana's request to procure legal services from the external firm Messrs Sory@Law.
In correspondence reviewed by myjoyonline.com, the PPA emphasised that as a state institution, Parliament should utilise the Attorney General’s Department for all legal matters.
This decision reflects the PPA's stance on maintaining institutional integrity and adherence to established protocols for legal representation.
In a letter dated December 12, 2022, and signed by PPA Chief Executive Officer Frank Mante, the PPA responded to Parliament's request submitted on November 15, 2022.
The PPA board denied the approval of the single-source procurement method sought for engaging Sory@Law, reinforcing the notion that state institutions must prioritize utilising resources within the Attorney General's Department for litigation.
“At the 31st Board Meeting of the 5th Board held on Thursday 8 December 2022, the Board could not approve your request to use the Single Source Procurement Method to engage Messrs Sory @ Law as an external solicitor to support Parliament and the Parliamentary Service at a Retainer Fee of GHS5,000.00 and specific fee for the conduct of constitutional cases in the Supreme Court at a fee not exceeding GHC300,000.00,” the PPA’s letter to the Clerk to Parliament said.
“The Board noted that, since the Attorney General is the Principal Legal Advisor, the Board is of the considered opinion that, Parliamentary Service should continue to use the Services of the AG in all legal matters,” the PPA letter to the Clerk to Parliament, Cyril Kwabena Oteng-Nsiah, further said.
During the 2023/2024 legal year, Sory@Law represented Parliament in various cases concerning the Parliament of Ghana.
In the ongoing 2024/2025 legal year, Sory@Law has filed and is representing Parliament in several new cases.
The most recent case involves Alexander Afenyo Markin against the Speaker of Parliament and the Attorney General’s Department, focusing on the interpretation of Article 97 (1) (g) and (h) related to the seats held by four current members of Parliament.

Latest Stories
-
Photos: Archbishop Charles Agyinasare hands over astroturf to Perez University College
14 minutes -
Supreme Court’s halt of Kpandai rerun prevents bigger complications – Prof. Osae-Kwapong
23 minutes -
NDC rules out third-term agenda for Mahama
35 minutes -
Ashanti Region: Military officer arrested over alleged illegal sale of firearms
37 minutes -
Tactical overview of Afcon 2025 – trends to expect
46 minutes -
Vice President commissions Softcare sanitary pads production line, reaffirms gov’t partnership
48 minutes -
Today’s front pages: Wednesday, December 17, 2025
1 hour -
OSP controversy: Individual views don’t reflect party position – NDC General Secretary
2 hours -
We returned winners, not losers – Bryan Acheampong rewrites NPP’s electoral history
2 hours -
‘Barely in office, already talking power?’ – Fifi Kwetey slams early succession talk in NDC
3 hours -
‘Performance, not sympathy’ – Bryan Acheampong says NPP must break tradition
3 hours -
After all the branding, we lost 7 Regions – Bryan Acheampong says Bawumia can’t be repackaged
3 hours -
‘The product failed in the market’ – Bryan Acheampong tears into Bawumia’s 2024 numbers
4 hours -
‘I’m way ahead’ – Bryan Acheampong dismisses polls, predicts NPP primary victory
4 hours -
‘I will support whoever wins’ – Bryan Acheampong pledges loyalty to NPP flagbearer
4 hours
