Audio By Carbonatix
Former Ashanti Bekwai MP Joseph Osei Owusu says the credibility of the internal election process rested on one clear principle: agreed rules applied equally to all candidates in the upcoming NPP presidential primaries.
Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Wednesday, he said the process began with clarity, not improvisation. “First, we started with the rules. How are we going to play the game?” he said.
According to him, the rules were formally shared with every contestant. “We brought the rules, we distributed them to all the contestants, and we sat together with them,” he said.
He said that even those who could not attend in person were represented.
“Some appeared in person. Others sent their representatives. But we went through the rules together and agreed these are the rules we’ll play by,” he said.
That agreement, he noted, was critical to trust. “If I allow you to breach the rule without sanction, then I have not provided sufficient basis to be confident in me,” he said.
He said consistency followed from that point. Attention then shifted to the delegate register.
“There was a 2023 register, which at the conference we agreed will be used for this election,” he said.
But constitutional changes made updates unavoidable.
“At the same conference, we amended the Constitution to allow new entrants, people like me, who otherwise would not have been delegates, to become delegates,” he said.
That decision, he explained, required careful handling to avoid suspicion.
“So we had to compile the list and give confidence that nothing was being done to favour any candidate,” he said.
He said candidates were involved at every stage. “We invited them to participate at every stage of the compilation,” he said.
Verification, he added, happened openly at the constituency level. “Once people filled their forms, we sent groups to the constituencies,” he said.
“At verification, the constituency executives were there. The contestants’ agents were also there,” he said.
Disputes were not ignored. “Where there were disagreements, we didn’t let them die down. They were brought to us,” he said.
He said disputed cases were reviewed jointly. “We sat together with the representatives of the contestants and went through the controversies,” he said.
Outstanding issues were then handled by a smaller body. “We formed an in-house committee to investigate and report,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
OpenAI changes deal with US military after backlash
36 minutes -
Mexican drug lord ‘El Mencho’ buried in golden coffin
46 minutes -
Building gold reserves, losing hospitals? – Finance professor flags 1% GDP cost
1 hour -
Trump ‘does not care’ if Iran play at World Cup
4 hours -
Burna Boy’s associate, Rahman Jago confirms singer converted to Islam
4 hours -
Amazon says drones damaged three facilities in UAE and Bahrain
5 hours -
NDC’s Baba Jamal wins Ayawaso East by-election
5 hours -
Integrity over individuals: Economic Fighters League maintains vote-buying stance in Ayawaso East
5 hours -
How to follow European football
5 hours -
A new dawn: Formula One charges into an unpredictable 2026
5 hours -
Trump threatens to halt trade with Spain over military base access
6 hours -
Trump says US Navy will protect ships in Middle East ‘if necessary’
6 hours -
Ghana shines in GSMA DNSI and DPRI 2025 report due to E-Levy repeal and tech neutrality
7 hours -
NJA College of Education inducts 379 students amidst infrastructure gains and calls for professional discipline
7 hours -
GJA President, executives join Sammy Gyamfi to observe One-Week memorial of father-in-law
7 hours
