
Audio By Carbonatix
The National Petroleum Authority (NPA) has reacted to claims by Parliament's Ranking Member on the Finance Committee, Cassiel Ato Forson that it failed to seek parliamentary approval before the collection of some levies.
These are; the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation Company Limited (BOST) margin, Fuel Marking Margin and the Unified Petroleum Pricing Fund (UPPF).
According to the authority, in a statement issued by the Corporate Affairs Division on Thursday, the assertion is flawed as the move is “specified in the Prescribed Petroleum Pricing Formula Regulations 2012, LI 2186.”
“The NPA wishes to state that its mandate to collect, charge or receive revenue with respect to the UPPF, BOST and Fuel Marking Margins is derived from the National Petroleum Authority (Prescribed Petroleum Pricing Formula), Regulations 2012, Legislative Instrument (LI) 2186, passed by the Parliament of the Republic of Ghana in July 2012.
On the back of this justification, the NPA insists that the said charges in the price buildup are not illegal.
Mr Forson had blamed the rampant increase in fuel prices at the doorstep of the NPA who, he said were responsible for astronomically driving up the levies.
“These margins must be approved by an act of parliament through the Fees and Charges and Miscellaneous Legislative Instrument. Therefore, the NPA is collecting these fees illegally.
"So they are acting with impunity. So the NPA should stop collecting those fees because they are illegal”, the MP told journalists.
The Ajumako Enyan Essiam MP was reacting in the wake of the Minority’s demand that government suspends the Special Petroleum Tax and review the sanitation levy in the 2022 budget.
On the increasing levies, the NPA explained that the Fuel Marking Margin are wholly based on the cost of undertaking the prescribed activities and not for any other reason.
“These margins were not just increased in 2021 but have been increased periodically since 2009 to this present time, due in part to the increases in the cost of operations in these activities over the time,” the statement indicated.
“Regulations 9 to 13 of the LI 2186 determines how to review the prescribed petroleum pricing formula, which states that the pricing formula shall include these margins and the Authority shall indicate these margins to take care of the above intended costs accordingly.”
It added that “it is without doubt that the absence of these margins in the price buildup would have hindered the achievement of the objectives for which these margins were introduced into the prescribed petroleum pricing formula.”
Latest Stories
-
Godfred Dame questions legality of former NAFCO CEO’s arrest, says access to client was denied
4 minutes -
Haruna Iddrisu orders GTEC to withdraw retirement directive affecting university lecturers
9 minutes -
Technology can stop hackers, but not customers surrendering their PINs – BoG Fintech Head
13 minutes -
University degrees should be judged by skills, not just jobs – Eduwatch to Adutwum
23 minutes -
Interior Ministry warns of possible flooding in Greater Accra ahead of Monday rains
26 minutes -
UNICEF, WHO Delegation trains NADMO Staff, assesses flood situation in Keta Municipality
30 minutes -
Respect police stops; they can save your life – drivers urged
34 minutes -
No meaningful sustainable development in a polarised society – Prof Gyampo
38 minutes -
Sierra Leone President commiserates with Mahama on June 29 flood disaster
43 minutes -
Gov’t hints at tougher measures against growing indiscipline in schools
47 minutes -
Dissident Hong Kong bookseller Lam Wing-kee dies aged 70
51 minutes -
England beat Mexico in thriller to reach World Cup quarter-final
56 minutes -
China says pilot crashed small plane into skyscraper for ‘personal reasons’
1 hour -
China’s internet got so mad about a celebrity’s ‘bad’ singing, her concert was cancelled
1 hour -
Backlash after China bubble tea firm ordered to pay Louis Vuitton $1.5m
1 hour