Audio By Carbonatix
The National Petroleum Authority (NPA) has reacted to claims by Parliament's Ranking Member on the Finance Committee, Cassiel Ato Forson that it failed to seek parliamentary approval before the collection of some levies.
These are; the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation Company Limited (BOST) margin, Fuel Marking Margin and the Unified Petroleum Pricing Fund (UPPF).
According to the authority, in a statement issued by the Corporate Affairs Division on Thursday, the assertion is flawed as the move is “specified in the Prescribed Petroleum Pricing Formula Regulations 2012, LI 2186.”
“The NPA wishes to state that its mandate to collect, charge or receive revenue with respect to the UPPF, BOST and Fuel Marking Margins is derived from the National Petroleum Authority (Prescribed Petroleum Pricing Formula), Regulations 2012, Legislative Instrument (LI) 2186, passed by the Parliament of the Republic of Ghana in July 2012.
On the back of this justification, the NPA insists that the said charges in the price buildup are not illegal.
Mr Forson had blamed the rampant increase in fuel prices at the doorstep of the NPA who, he said were responsible for astronomically driving up the levies.
“These margins must be approved by an act of parliament through the Fees and Charges and Miscellaneous Legislative Instrument. Therefore, the NPA is collecting these fees illegally.
"So they are acting with impunity. So the NPA should stop collecting those fees because they are illegal”, the MP told journalists.
The Ajumako Enyan Essiam MP was reacting in the wake of the Minority’s demand that government suspends the Special Petroleum Tax and review the sanitation levy in the 2022 budget.
On the increasing levies, the NPA explained that the Fuel Marking Margin are wholly based on the cost of undertaking the prescribed activities and not for any other reason.
“These margins were not just increased in 2021 but have been increased periodically since 2009 to this present time, due in part to the increases in the cost of operations in these activities over the time,” the statement indicated.
“Regulations 9 to 13 of the LI 2186 determines how to review the prescribed petroleum pricing formula, which states that the pricing formula shall include these margins and the Authority shall indicate these margins to take care of the above intended costs accordingly.”
It added that “it is without doubt that the absence of these margins in the price buildup would have hindered the achievement of the objectives for which these margins were introduced into the prescribed petroleum pricing formula.”
Latest Stories
-
Gov’t targets petroleum upstream recovery after five years of consecutive decline
4 minutes -
TUC welcomes ICJ ruling affirming workers’ right to strike
32 minutes -
NDC teachers launch grassroots political drive in Western North
54 minutes -
GN Savings and Loans to reopen first branch in Elmina – Nduom
1 hour -
Mr Eazi’s Zagadat Capital acquires 17.31 per cent stake in Intravenous Infusions PLC
2 hours -
Usyk keeps titles with controversial Verhoeven stoppage
2 hours -
Suspect killed after opening fire on Secret Service near White House
2 hours -
Mahama, Macron push new chapter on reparatory justice
3 hours -
Ghana Institute of Architects cracks down on fake architects and illegal practice
3 hours -
Ghana to destroy over 4,000 illegal weapons in nationwide arms amnesty exercise
4 hours -
Headmen and Queen Mothers meet in Binde to promote lasting peace in Mamprugu Kingdom
4 hours -
Tension in Kasoa: Assembly pulls down shops for 24-hour economy project
5 hours -
FIFA World Cup: Iran moves camp from USA to Mexico, amid ongoing conflict
5 hours -
Eastern Regional Minister halts Koforidua China Mall project over severe flooding
5 hours -
Tamale police arrest suspect with large quantities of drugs
6 hours