Audio By Carbonatix
Private legal practitioner, Kwaku Paintsil says that wives can sue their husbands for refusing to give them money for housekeeping, aka 'chop money'.
He advised women in such situations to go to court to ensure that their husbands fulfilled their financial obligations.
"A lot of men have got this mentality. They believe that they do the woman a favour by providing those kinds of things. So please, if you’ve got a husband who is refusing to do that, this has got nothing to do with divorce, bring him before the family tribunal.
"Get an order of the court to compel him. Whether he loves you or not, these obligations are imposed by law. He cannot choose to love you according to how he looks after his children."
Kwaku Paintsil was addressing legal concerns from fervent listeners of Joy FM’s Super Morning Show on Tuesday during a segment dubbed “Free Legal Clinic”.
He also gave legal counsel to a worried lady who said she has been married to her husband for five years who was demanding the papers to the family house they are building together.
According to her, her spouse currently resides abroad and has vowed not to pay rent but rather use those funds in building a family house.
He also convinced her to live with his siblings in a family house. But, instead, she moved out into her family house due to financial constraints.
Mr Paintsil said the husband has no right to demand the things he has given to her during the course of the marriage.
"There is a presumption that whatever is acquired during the course of the marriage must have been acquired for both of them. Unless there's good reason to demonstrate that they intended to acquire it separately."
Mr Paintsil said the law now recognises non-economic contribution on the part of women.
"At the end of the day, if the woman has spent all her life looking after the children, providing all the kind of things women request to provide from their men. Then at the end of the day, it’s not a simple case for the man asking for the documents of the house.
"We don’t know whose name is in it. But even if it turns out that the documents or the title deeds are in the name of the man only. Now the law can imply co-ownership on the part of the woman. So the man can’t just come for his documents."
Latest Stories
-
Party cannot overturn EC verdict without court – Inusah Fuseini on NDC Ayawaso East primaries
46 minutes -
Mahama reprimanded Baba Jamal – NDC says code of conduct is already working
1 hour -
Description of conduct as ‘inappropriate’ is based on NDC’s constitution – Gbande on vote-buying claims
2 hours -
NDC can only reprimand, not prosecute – Gbande explains limits of party sanctions
2 hours -
Even talking about it is progress – NDC’s Gbande defends probe into vote-buying claims
2 hours -
PM asks Sir Jim Ratcliffe to apologise for saying UK ‘colonised by immigrants’
5 hours -
16 hours of daily use is ‘problematic,’ not addiction – Instagram boss
5 hours -
US House votes to overturn Trump’s tariffs on Canada
5 hours -
Dad unlawfully killed daughter in Texas shooting, coroner rules
6 hours -
Anas wins 7 – 0 as SC unanimously rejects attempts to reverse judgment in his favour
6 hours -
Trump tells Netanyahu Iran nuclear talks must continue
6 hours -
The cocoa conundrum: Why Ghana’s farmers are poor despite making the world’s best chocolate
7 hours -
Powerful cyclone kills at least 31 as it tears through Madagascar port
7 hours -
GoldBod summons 6 gold service providers over compliance exercise
8 hours -
Power disruption expected in parts of Accra West as ECG conducts maintenance
8 hours
