Private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu has stated that the President does not necessarily need a response from the Chief Justice before a prima facie determination regarding a petition for removal.
According to Mr Kpebu, there is no breach of the law in President John Mahama’s handling of the process, as some are suggesting.
In an interview on JoyNews' The Pulse on Thursday, he explained that the procedure under Article 146(3) of the 1992 Constitution involves two distinct stages: first, the President, in consultation with the Council of State, must determine if there is a basis for setting up a tribunal or a committee.
Contrary to arguments made by others, he noted that the formation of a five-member tribunal is not automatic but depends on this initial determination.
“In order to make that prima facie determination, you don’t always need the response of the Chief Justice or any other justice of the superior courts,” he stated.
Illustrating his point, he outlined scenarios where a petition may be dismissed outright without requiring the Chief Justice’s input. He explained that if a petition is unsigned or lacks the petitioner’s name, the President may, in consultation with the Council of State, dismiss it as defective.
Additionally, petitions that are incoherent, filled with insults, or lack substantive claims may also be rejected without seeking a response from the Chief Justice.
“What the President cannot do is find merit in a petition and refuse to hear from the Chief Justice before proceeding to the second stage, where a tribunal would be formed,” he clarified.
Kpebu’s remarks come in response to former Deputy Attorney General Alfred Tuah-Yeboah, who earlier insisted that Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo must be notified and allowed to respond before any determination is made regarding a prima facie case against her.
Meanwhile, the Chief Justice has requested copies of petitions submitted to President Mahama seeking her removal from office.
In a letter to the President on Thursday, March 27, she appealed for access to the documents to enable her to respond accordingly.
Latest Stories
-
Brazilian Supreme Court justice threatens to arrest Bolsonaro
4 hours -
Queen Elizabeth II’s fashion to feature in exhibition
4 hours -
North Macedonia backs Morocco’s autonomy plan as sole basis for resolving Sahara dispute
4 hours -
Coach Lars Björkegren “proud” of Black Queens after penalty defeat to Morocco
4 hours -
Hosts Morocco to take on Nigeria in African women’s final
4 hours -
We were the better team – Queens coach Bjorkegren reflects on WAFCON 2024 semi-final loss
4 hours -
Mali court rejects appeal to release four Barrick employees, judge says
4 hours -
Kenyan man on death row in Saudi Arabia freed
5 hours -
Euro 2025: England beat Italy to reach finals
5 hours -
Ho Technical University partners with GhIE Branch 6 For Engineering and Innovation Week
5 hours -
The voices in the cockpit fuelling controversy over Air India crash
5 hours -
Mike Lynch estate and business partner owe HP Enterprise £700m, court rules
5 hours -
Trump administration pulls US out of UNESCO again
5 hours -
WAFCON 2024: Ghana’s Black Queens miss out on final after penalty loss to Morocco
5 hours -
Coca-Cola will roll out cane sugar Coke in US after Trump push
5 hours