Audio By Carbonatix
Representatives of Anas Aremeyaw Anas say the investigative journalist may choose to testify as prosecution witness after the Supreme Court quashed a High Court order to have him testify in-camera in the case, Republic vs Kwesi Nyantakyi.
In a statement published on his Twitter page on Tuesday, reacting to the Supreme Court ruling, Cromwell Gray LLP, legal firm of the Tiger Eye Pi CEO said, "Anas Aremeyaw Anas agreed to testify in the stead of Ahmed Suale on the condition he will be allowed to do so in-camera or in chambers."
The statement added that "Anas may choose to testify as prosecution witness or not.
"Anas and his Tiger Eye Pi team will continue to wear the iconic face beads as a symbol of impartial anonymity in investigative journalism and to highlight the extreme risk in that line of duty."
They explained that "the Star witness for the Republic, Ahmed Suale, who was one of the investigative journalists in respect of the documentary, was murdered in Madina, Accra weeks before his testimony could be taken."
The ruling from the Supreme Court presided over by Justice Baffoe-Bonnie granted an application for certiorari filed by Kwesi Nyantakyi quashing the order of High Court 2, Criminal Division, Accra granting a dispensation to Anas Aremeyaw Anas to testify in camera as a prosecution witness in the criminal case entitled Republic v Kwesi Nyantakyi & Another.
They argued that the premiere of the ‘Number 12’ documentary was done in the open without any security concerns, so why would a hearing in court with full security be done in camera and not in an open court?
“Tiger Eye PI and its CEO, Anas Aremeyaw Anas went public with the video documentary because it was in the public interest and should have his testimony in open court, too. The public has an interest in his testimony,” they said.
Following Justice Baffoe-Bonnie's ruling, reports suggested that testifying in open court like any other citizen appearing in court for any hearing means Anas cannot come to court in mask of face beads.
But, his legal team insists the reports are false and should be disregarded.
"The public should disregard fake reportage that has been ordered by the Supreme Court or is being compelled by the Supreme Court to appear in court without his trademark face beads."
Nyantakyi was arraigned before court on March 4, 2020.
Latest Stories
-
A rising number of women have never been screened for cervical cancer. Here are the risks
5 minutes -
Ghanaian youngster Sam Amo-Ameyaw scores brace in Strasbourg’s big win
11 minutes -
2026 U-20 WWC: ‘We have a chance to recover from opening defeat’ – Charles Sampson
12 minutes -
‘Social media language’ in classrooms not on our blind side – Education Ministry
12 minutes -
Republic Bank, UPSA sign MOU to strengthen staff skills and industry-academia collaboration
15 minutes -
World Literacy Day: Literacy doesn’t develop in isolation – JustED Foundation
20 minutes -
Kwadwo Opoku announces arrival in Greece with debut brace
27 minutes -
Kurt Okraku vs Kwame Nkrumah: Time is the author of legacy
30 minutes -
Post-results school selection policy caused placement crisis – Kingsley Agyemang
30 minutes -
Chalé Day mixer sets tone for bigger December celebration
32 minutes -
Executive Women Network celebrates a decade of leadership, sets sights on next generation of impact
39 minutes -
“I’m happy to have scored” – Ernest Nuamah ends long Ligue 1 goal drought
42 minutes -
52-year-old spiritualist and farmer found dead at Assin Amoabeng
43 minutes -
Tensions rise at GNAT hall as parents seek solutions to CSSPS challenges
45 minutes -
Belgian FA still wants Balogun ban answers
50 minutes