Audio By Carbonatix
Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, Sam George says the court does not have the power to prevent Parliament from passing the Anti-LGBTQ bill.
The vocal proponent of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill says the judiciary should not overstep its boundaries by attempting to dictate the legislative process.
Speaking on JoyNews' AM Show, Mr George questioned the court's willingness to entertain two recent cases brought before it against the bill's passage.
"I'm wondering why the courts are going ahead to even entertain any case at this point in time because the courts must bear in mind that no court can issue a judgment or give directive to the President that you can’t discuss this matter in Cabinet."
He highlighted that while the courts play a crucial role in ensuring due process and keeping the legislation in check, they cannot assume to have the power to impede on Parliament's right to pass laws.
"It is the prerogative of Parliament to pass legislation, and so no court should think that they have the power to tell Parliament that you can pass this bill or you cannot pass this," Mr George stressed.
Citing a previous case involving the Marijuana legislation, Sam George underscored that the courts have the ability to review the legislative process after Parliament has passed a law.
He said in such cases, they can assess whether all necessary procedures were followed and potentially nullify the law if due process was not observed. However, he firmly stated that this should not interfere with Parliament's right to sit and pass laws.
"You can pass a judgment, saying that Parliament did not go through all the processes and nullify the law. But you can't tell Parliament that you cannot sit and pass a law," added Mr. George.
The proposed LGBT Bill has been a subject of intense debate in Ghana, sparking discussions both domestically and internationally.
The bill seeks to criminalise activities related to homosexuality and increase penalties for those involved.
While it has generated support from certain segments of society who believe it aligns with Ghana's cultural and religious values, it has also drawn criticism from human rights organizations and advocates who argue that it infringes upon the rights and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community.
Latest Stories
-
England are tough, but we can play against Ghana, Panama – Croatia coach reacts to World Cup draw
6 minutes -
We can beat anyone – Otto Addo reacts to World Cup draw
22 minutes -
GPL 2025/26: Mensah brace fires All Blacks to victory over Eleven Wonders
2 hours -
This Saturday on Newsfile: Petitions against the OSP, EC heads, and 2025 WASSCE results
2 hours -
Ambassador urges U.S. investors to prioritise land verification as Ghana courts more investment
3 hours -
Europe faces an expanding corruption crisis
3 hours -
Ghana’s Dr Bernard Appiah appointed to WHO Technical Advisory Group on alcohol and drug epidemiology
3 hours -
2026 World Cup: Ghana drawn against England, Croatia and Panama in Group L
3 hours -
3 dead, 6 injured in Kpando–Aziave road crash
3 hours -
Lightwave eHealth accuses Health Ministry of ‘fault-finding’ and engaging competitor to audit its work
3 hours -
Ayewa Festival ignites Farmers Day with culture, flavour, and a promise of bigger things ahead
4 hours -
Government to deploy 60,000 surveillance cameras nationwide to tackle cybercrime
4 hours -
Ghana DJ Awards begins 365-day countdown to 2026 event
4 hours -
Making Private University Charters Optional in Ghana: Implications and Opportunities
4 hours -
Mampong tragedy: Students among 30 injured as curve crash kills three
4 hours
