Audio By Carbonatix
Minority Legal Counsel in Parliament and Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has suggested that the position taken by the Attorney General in the ongoing Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) case may be interpreted as reflecting the stance of the Executive.
Speaking in an interview on Joy FM's Top Story on Thursday, April 23, Mr. Darko argued that because the Attorney General represents the state in court, his legal arguments in the case before the Supreme Court cannot be easily separated from the broader position of government.
He said this has become especially significant in light of public debate over whether the President should make a public statement on the matter or allow the judicial process to proceed without executive commentary.
According to him, while the case is currently before the courts and must be handled with caution, the Attorney General’s filings may still be seen by observers as indicative of the government’s position.
“If the Attorney General is in court making arguments on behalf of the state, then people will naturally read that as the position of the Executive,” he suggested.
Mr. Darko noted that although the President cannot be compelled to comment on a matter before the judiciary, public interpretation of "government silence is inevitable, especially in high-profile constitutional and institutional disputes."
“If the President will not speak on the matter, that is fine. Nobody can force him to speak, but people will draw conclusions,” he added.
He also referenced past instances in which the Executive has intervened in political or legislative matters, arguing that such precedents influence public expectations in the current debate.
However, he cautioned that the matter remains sub judice and should be determined solely by the Supreme Court without external interference or attempts to direct its outcome.
His comment was in response to a question on why Civil Society Organisations and the Minority are mounting pressure on President John Dramani Mahama to comment on the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) matter while the case is still before the Supreme Court.
Latest Stories
-
Let’s satisfy everyone’s curiosity – Agalga backs early GoldBod probe
36 minutes -
GoldBod is ready to account – Agalga defends Gold Board as calls for probe intensify
53 minutes -
Don’t limit GoldBod probe to 2025 – Agalga demands full audit of gold trading scheme
1 hour -
GoldBod has never incurred losses – Agalga challenges claims as Minority pushes probe
2 hours -
NAIMOS raids Ankobra, destroys 86 chanfang machines in fresh galamsey crackdown
2 hours -
GoldBod is the tool behind Ghana’s stability – Agalga defends gold strategy
2 hours -
Trump administration moves to impose more than $100,000 fee for H-1B worker visas
2 hours -
Oil prices steady as investors weigh impact of expanded US sanctions against Iran
4 hours -
Trump administration plans to revoke visas of foreigners seeking asylum
4 hours -
US appeals court considers reassigning case from judge over AI use
5 hours -
Trump bought shares in Elon Musk’s SpaceX in June, financial disclosure shows
5 hours -
MTN approves $375 million share buyback after profit rise
5 hours -
Ghana gold buyers went weeks without funds, sources say
5 hours -
Nevada sues to block Trump administration’s Colorado River plan
5 hours -
Tunisian hospital receives 19 bodies after migrant boat sinks
5 hours