Preliminary comments
- These pink sheets are already public documents anyway as posted at every polling station by the EC itself and from which copies were given to political parties.
- The true enquiry of the Petition is whether or not the various Presidential declarations made by the EC is the cumulative outcome of those pink sheets.
- This enquiry necessarily implies that the original pink sheets must resemble in every sense, the copies which the political parties are in possession of.
- Without the original pink sheets, it becomes near impossible to make the comparisons between originals and the copies and to ascertain to truth.
- Today's application for inspection of documents sought nothing but a request for the EC to make available to the Petitioner what it has in its possession. By reason of its constitutional mandate, only the EC is possession of the original pink sheets.
- With or without this Presidential Petition, the EC is mandated by law to make these pink sheets public anyway.
- This nation enacted the Right to Information Law (RTI ACT) to make institutions transparent and accountable to citizens. The need for transparency is heightened and and becomes more crucial when the question is whether executive authority and the will of the people is properly located in a person/ party.
- The decision of the SC today, in refusing to allow inspection of EC documents, is to treat the EC as if it is a private entity! It is not. I fail to see how the EC, in performing its Public duty can be prejudiced by disclosing documents it must disclose anyway.
- Today's decision unfortunately reflects some inaccurate public commentary which seeks to say that the Petitioner has more burden on its hands to produce documents to prove its case,( which is correct) and the EC necessarily stands absolved if the Petitioner fails in that regard ( which is wrong). This inaccurate commentary discounts two (2) crucial elements:
- Even if the Petitioner is lousy or indolent in regards to its watchdog role as a key interested party in the 2020 elections, we MUST STILL BE INTERESTED IN KNOWING WHETHER THE EC DID ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY WELL as a public body and whether it presented us with the right winner. This demand of this public duty of the EC has absolutely nothing to do with the Petitioner. Otherwise, the unfortunate proposition will be that everytime an election is not challenged and there is no Petitioner, the EC would be deemed to have performed its duty in accordance with law even if infact it did not.
Secondly,
- In the present need to prove its case, the Petitioner is presented with a situation where it cannot do so without the originals from the EC because the Petitioner's case is primarily a disputation of maths which has the effect of making comparisons between copies and originals inevitable.
This is fatal, yet again. And I disagree with the legal reasoning of the court.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
We didn’t sneak out 10 BVDs; they were auctioned as obsolete equipment – EC
4 hours -
King Charles to resume public duties after progress in cancer treatment
4 hours -
Arda Guler scores on first start in La Liga as Madrid beat Real Sociedad
4 hours -
Fatawu Issahaku’s Leicester City secures Premier League promotion after Leeds defeat
5 hours -
Anticipation builds as Junior Speller hosts nationwide auditions
5 hours -
Etse Sikanku: The driver’s mate conundrum
6 hours -
IMF Deputy Chief worried large chunk of Eurobonds is used to service debt
6 hours -
Otumfuo Osei Tutu II celebrates 25 years of peaceful rule on golden stool
6 hours -
We have enough funds to pay accruing benefits; we’ve never missed pension payments since 1991 – SSNIT
6 hours -
Let’s embrace shared vision and propel National Banking College – First Deputy Governor
7 hours -
Liverpool agree compensation deal with Feyenoord for Slot
7 hours -
Ejisu by-election: There’s no evidence of NPP engaging in vote-buying – Ahiagbah
7 hours -
Ejisu by-election: Independent ex-NPP MP’s campaign team warns party against dubious tactics
8 hours -
ZEN Petroleum supports Tse-Addo Future Leaders School
8 hours -
NPP must win back Adentan seat in 2024 polls – Obeng Fosu
9 hours