Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court rules against sections of the Citizenship Act, allowing dual citizens to hold positions such as Chief Justice and Chief Director.
In the case of Francis Osei-Bonsu v The Attorney General, the Supreme Court declared certain sections of the Citizenship Act unconstitutional, permitting dual citizens to serve in various high-ranking positions.
The court's decision, delivered by a majority, nullifies the sections that bar dual citizens from roles including Chief Justice, Commissioner of the Value Added Tax Service, and Chief Director of a Ministry.
Represented by Bright Okyere-Adjekum Esq., the plaintiff, Francis Osei-Bonsu, successfully challenged the constitutionality of these provisions.
The ruling effectively amends Article 289(2) of the 1992 Constitution, allowing dual citizens to be appointed to key government positions previously restricted to single citizens.
Latest Stories
-
Driver beaten to death over misunderstanding at Gomoa Achiase
5 minutes -
Bagre Dam spillage: 68 communities in Northern region alerted as Burkina Faso monitors water levels
7 minutes -
ECG announces power outages in Central, Eastern and Western Regions on Thursday
10 minutes -
God does not take campaign instructions
1 hour -
Government moves to address rising accommodation costs at KNUST
1 hour -
Cristiano Ronaldo marries longtime love Georgina Rodríguez in Portugal
1 hour -
Political parties, judiciary must reform themselves to protect Africa’s democracy – Asiedu Nketia
1 hour -
Luv FM High School Debate: T.I AMASS advances as IBASS makes impressive debut
2 hours -
Greater Accra Business Merit Awards honours SIM Group of Companies
2 hours -
Cyberbullying : When social media becomes a tool for public humiliation
2 hours -
Awerco Construction hands over 130-bed Weija Paediatric Hospital to Health Ministry
2 hours -
YEA to migrate personnel on public sector salary structure – CEO
2 hours -
I won’t be part of this selective justice – Atta Akyea rejects Adu-Boahene trial during legal vacation
2 hours -
GBA has no business responding to law firms’ petitions – Dafeamekpor
2 hours -
Is Legal Vacation intended for the Bench or the Bar?
2 hours