"GCPP does not qualify as a party to be funded because it has no representative in Parliament and also all efforts by IEA to know where GCPP's offices are located in the country over the years had proved futile." The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) has said.
The IEA described as baseless the claims by the Great Consolidated Popular Party (GCPP) that the institute is using foreign funds to promote four leading political parties in the country.
The IEA said GCPP was crying foul out of frustration since its allegations against the institute held no water.
The GCPP, in a statement issued last week and signed by the General Secretary, John Thompson, described the IEA as a think-tank that was running a parallel Inter-Party Advisory Committee (IPAC) with the four leading parties to decide for the rest of the political parties, adding that the act was undermining democracy.
"lEA is a neo-colonialist organization whose activities should be critically examined by the government," the statement maintained.
The party claimed that the monies being used in assisting the parties were coming from a Dutch organization, the Netherlands Institute for Multi Party Democracy (NIMD).
According to Mr. Thompson, this action of the IEA was making the political playing field in the country uneven, and also described the IEA as a body which used illegal means to fund four parties to the detriment of others.
Speaking to DAILY GUIDE in reaction to the accusations, however, a source close to the IEA stressed that before a political party could qualify for funding by any entity, it had to have at least one or two representatives in the nation's House of Parliament.
It said despite IEA's advice to the leaders of GCPP to fight for Parliamentary seats to enable it to get equal support from various funding bodies as other parties were getting, GCPP remained adamant.
The source stated that IEA did not see why parties' capacities should not be built to help enhance the nation's democracy, stressing that the laws of the land prohibited direct funding of political parties from foreign bodies but did not prevent indirect funding.
It emphasized that the IEA, through various measures, had ensured over the years that political parties including the GCPP were educated in all their political endeavours to ensure political and democratic stability in the country.
Source: Daily Guide
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Banking that rewards you: Access Bank rolls out loyalty program
4 minutes -
SSNIT needs bold reforms to build a more inclusive, resilient social security system-VEEP
10 minutes -
Morocco donates 2,000 tons of fertilisers to Ghana
16 minutes -
Koforidua-based NDC lawyer Bernard Bediako Baidoo picks forms to contest Akwatia by-election primary
20 minutes -
The UEW advantage: Why choose UEW for your next qualification
21 minutes -
Ghana close to winning WAFCON – Head coach Björkegren
25 minutes -
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital sees 700 cancer cases annually
28 minutes -
Kamaldeen Sulemana has talent but still needs polishing – Atalanta boss
45 minutes -
Ablakwa honoured as ‘Most Dynamic Minister’ by Africa Development Council
51 minutes -
‘Makra mo’ – A legend’s farewell to Daddy Lumba
54 minutes -
MP accuses Attorney-General of conflict of interest over Duffuor case withdrawal
59 minutes -
Atidefe Foundation promotes afforestation in Akatsi South District
1 hour -
The role of the NCCE in public communication: Why the gov’t must rethink engagement strategy
1 hour -
Lands Minister demands prosecution of impostors who locked up Bekwai Forestry Commission office
1 hour -
Bagbin receives historic ‘Bond of 1844’ from British archives for parliamentary museum display
1 hour