Audio By Carbonatix
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has strongly criticised the establishment of the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) team by President John Mahama, describing it as illegal and unconstitutional.
According to him, President Mahama lacked the legal authority to form the committee at the time, as he was merely the president-elect and not yet in office.
Speaking on JoyFM Top Story on Wednesday, January 15, Mr Darko argued that Section 3 of the Whistleblowers Act lists specific individuals and entities to whom whistleblowers can report, such as Police Officers, the Attorney General, the Auditor General, Staff of Intelligence Agencies, and Members of Parliament.
He stated that while his colleague in Parliament, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, who is the MP for North Tongu qualifies to be on the committee, he questioned the qualifications of other members of the ORAL team under the provisions of the Act.
“If we take Hon Okudzeto Ablakwa who is a Member of Parliament and so if anybody feels that some crime has been committed, it can go to him.
"But does Martin Kpebu fall into any of these categories? Is he a member of the National Media Commission? Is Kofi Boakye, the former Police officer, a member of the Narcotics Control Board? Is Mr. Domelevo part of a district assembly or head of a recognized institution or religious body," he asked.
Mr Darko insisted that the formation of the ORAL team contravened the provisions of the Whistleblowers Act.
He further noted that as president-elect, Mr Mahama did not have executive authority at the time to create such a committee.
“The Whistleblowers Act he's talking about has the people you can disclose information to not a group of people set up by a President.
“In any case, when His Excellency the President John Dramani Mahama set up the ORAL Committee, he was the president-elect, he did not hold any executive authority. What legal authority did he have to set up the ORAL in the first place," the Suame MP questioned.
He asserted that the ORAL Committee, from its inception, lacked a constitutional foundation, stating that the committee is "unconstitutional and illegal."
Latest Stories
-
Abolish or Reform? Abu Jinapor counsels sober reflection on debate over future of Special Prosecutor’s Office
3 hours -
2026 World Cup: Can Ghana navigate England, Croatia, and Panama in Group L?
3 hours -
NAIMOS task force arrests 9 Chinese illegal miners, destroys equipment at Dadieso
3 hours -
NAIMOS advances into Atiwa Forest, uncovers child labour, river diversion and heavy machinery
3 hours -
NAIMOS Task Force storms Fanteakwa South, dismantles galamsey operations
4 hours -
The Kissi Agyebeng Removal Bid: A Look at the Numbers
5 hours -
DVLA to roll out digitised accident reports, new number plates and 24-hour services
5 hours -
DVLA Workers’ Union opens 2025 Annual Residential Delegates Congress with call for excellence, equity and solidarity
5 hours -
Scholarships Secretariat sets December 8–9 interviews for Commonwealth Scholarship applicants
5 hours -
WASSCE decline reveals deep gaps, there’s need to overhaul education system – Franklin Cudjoe
6 hours -
JOY FM Drive Time host Lexis Bill leads fans up Aburi Mountain in energetic ‘Walk With Lexis’ fitness experience
6 hours -
2026 World Cup: Ghana to open campaign in Toronto against Panama
7 hours -
President Mahama, Lordina support retired Assemblies of God pastors, widows with medical care and Christmas gifts
7 hours -
2025/26 GPL: Nations FC fight back to claim 2-1 win over Heart of Lions
7 hours -
Tanzania responds to international criticism over October post-election events
7 hours
